Click here to Search This
Site -- For or with more information, contact us.
Fed Rubber Stamps PNC Reciting Fair Finance Watch Comments But No Rebuttal So AI Next
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE,
Dec 11 – As PNC Bank has grown it has become
more disparate in its lending. After its CEO
Bill Demchak announced a $4.1 billion proposal
to buy FirstBank and bragged, "We just
effectively bought Colorado," Fair Finance Watch
prepared an early filing to the regulators
demanding scrutiny and hearings. While
preparing for PNC's sure to be coming next
bank-grab as PNC expands in AI and crypto, FFW
commented twice, as noted by the Fed:
"The
Board received two timely adverse comments on
the proposal, both from the same commenter.32
The commenter objected to the proposal, alleging
that, based on data reported under the Home
Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975 (“HMDA”), 33 PNC
Bank made fewer home loans to African American
individuals as compared to white individuals
nationwide, including in Pennsylvania, Michigan,
Texas, Florida, Indiana, Maryland, New York,
Alabama, Colorado, the District of Columbia,
Illinois, Georgia, Arizona, Virginia,
California, Missouri, New Jersey, North
Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, Delaware,
Massachusetts, Kentucky, South Carolina, and
Wisconsin in 2024. The commenter also alleged
that PNC Bank denied home loan applications of
African American individuals at a higher rate
than those of white individuals. 34 The
commenter requested that the Board consider and
hold hearings regarding a consumer complaint
submitted by an unknown customer of PNC Bank to
the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
(“CFPB”) regarding an allegation that the
consumer’s account was frozen by the bank
without explanation, which was published on the
CFPB’s consumer complaint database (“CFPB
database”). The commenter also more generally
requested that the Board review consumer
complaints in the CFPB’s database regarding PNC
Bank."
But there is no rebuttal. Game on - as PNC
promotes crypto trading, orders staff back to
the office only to fire then for AI - and
to outsource decisions to AI. It will all be
opposed.
On
October 15 the OCC provided some responsive
documents - but withheld in full 435 pages,
while providing suborned letters from supportive
commenters who have PNC on their Board of
Directors (can you say, conflict of interest) or
who name support. OCC responsive documents in
Inner City Press' CloudDocument here.
In
state after state, PNC for African Americans has
(many) more denials than originations, while the
opposite is true for white borrows. The pattern
is striking:
In
New York, where PNC recently and unceremoniously
closed a deposit facility, PNC in 2024 denied 52
applications from African Americans while making
fewer, only 28 loans - while it made fully 289
loans to whites and denied only 252
applications. This follows the same PNC pattern
and is disparate.
In Colorado, which PNC CEO's says the bank has
now "effectively bought," PNC in 2024 denied 12
applications from African Americans while making
only 17 loans - while it made fully 422 loans to
whites and denied only 244 applications. This is
disparate.
In Arizona, where PNC lists 60 branches and now
proposes to further expand, PNC in 2024 denied
15 applications from African Americans while
making only 22 loans - while it made fully 796
loans to whites and denied only 466
applications. This is disparate.
There are more states.
Watch
this site.
***
December 8,
2025
Federal Reserve Board Nixed Public Comments on Merger Now Cleveland Reserve Bank Spins
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY/SOUTH BRONX,
Dec 5 – As US bank regulators loosen rules -
including the FDIC moving to eliminate public
comment altogether on branch expansion
applications - more big banks are moving to get
bigger.
And
now Federal Reserve is rejecting public comments
opposing mergers, here Fifth Third's already
sued Comerica proposal, citing the "reputation"
of the submitter. Inner City Press / Fair
Finance Watch wrote to the Board Secretary:
Yesterday
Fair Finance Watch emailed a timely comment
opposing Fifth Third / Comerica as we have
always done - and got back this (which I'm glad
we saw) "This is the mail system at host
www2.webmail.pair.com. I'm sorry to have
to inform you that your message could not be
delivered to one or more recipients. It's
attached below.
"federalreserve.gov:
Your access to this mail system has been
rejected due to the sending MTA's poor
reputation."
We
ask that an explanation be provided - and that
the Federal Reserve System check on this pending
application and other applications, including
going forward, that it has not rejected comments
from the public. Awaiting Fed response,
Matthew Lee, Esq., Executive Director, Fair
Finance Watch / Inner City Press
The response, days later, came not from the
Board but a Reserve Bank, that in Cleveland:
"comments can also be sent electronically to
Comments.applications@clev.frb.org.”1 In
order to ensure proper receipt of electronic
comments on an application, please use the email
address provided in the Federal Register
notice.2 As you noted in your correspondence,
based on consideration of the initial server
from which it was sent, your first email on
November 28, 2025, was flagged for spam and
other suspicious activity, and automatically
rejected by the Board’s system prior to
receipt. However, the subsequent message
that you sent to the Board’s email address on
November 29, 2025, was received, and that
message included the comment emailed on November
28, 2025."
December
1, 2025
Fed Rubber Stamps Pinnacle Synovus Merger Protested on Community Reinvestment Act
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
NASHVILLE, Nov
25 – Synovus Bank, with a track record of
disparate lending and consumer complaints, aims
to cash out and merge with Nashville-based
Pinnacle.
But Pinnacle has its own disparities, and is
under-regulated by the Tennessee Commissioner of
Financial Institutions, who refuses to provide
any documents to anyone but Tennessee "citizens"
(not even those *in* Tennessee).
So
Fair Finance Watch filed Community Reinvestment
Act challenges with the Federal Reserve and the
Georgia regulator (both have confirmed receipt
and the Fed has sent
to Pinnacle) as well as the recalcitrant
Tennessee regulator, who refuses to give records
or even confirm receipt of the challenge.
Pinnacle has Tennessee in the palm of its hand,
lock stock and barrel, regulator and media.
And
now it has the Federal Reserve too, which on
November 25 issued a rubber stamp approval,
including that FFW "objected to the proposal,
alleging that both Synovus Bank and Pinnacle
Bank generally made proportionally fewer home
loans to African American individuals as
compared to white individuals in 2024
The
Fed Order concedes as to FFW that "The data cited by
this commenter corresponds to
publicly available 2024 data
reported by both Synovus Bank
and Pinnacle Bank under the
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
of 1975 (“HMDA”), 12 U.S.C. §
2801 et seq." - but the Fed
doesn't care about disparities.
It continues: "This commenter also alleged that
Pinnacle Bank denied home loan applications of
African American individuals at a higher rate
than those of white individuals." But the Fed
still approved.
Back
on October 9 the Fed asked Pinnacle nine
multi-part questions, including "A copy of the
CRA policy to be used by the combined
organization or, if one is not available, a
projected timeline for completion. 4.
Discuss the combined organization’s plans to
manage third party partnership compliance risk
exposure, including, but not limited to, BHG
Financial and GreenSky, LLC. a. Include in your
discussion anticipated key leadership positions
and any individuals identified to fill them;
plans for reporting/Management" - full letter here.
From
the comment: Dear Chair Powell and others in the
FRS:
...
Fair Finance Watch has reviewed the
just-released 2024 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
data of Synovus and finds that while it made
3.18 loans to whites for each denial to whites,
it made only 1.7 loans to African Americans for
each denial to African Americans.
Pinnacle is of even greater concern. In
Virginia, where Pinnacle received a Low
Satisfactory on the Lending Test in its most
recently (May 2023) CRA performance evaluation,
in 2024 it made 133 mortgage loans to whites,
with 19 denials, but only 13 loans to African
Americans, with fully eight denials...
This application should not be approved;
particularly in light of the disparities, public
evidentiary hearings are needed.
Watch this site.
***
November
24, 2025
On Fifth Third Bid for Comerica CRA Protest Now Fed Asks of Branches and Direct Express
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY/SOUTH BRONX,
Nov 18 – As US bank regulators loosen rules -
including the FDIC moving to eliminate public
comment altogether on branch expansion
applications - now more big banks are moving to
get bigger.
On October 6, Fifth Third announced it will
apply to buy damaged Comerica Bank. On October
8-9, it was opposed, to the Fed and OCC. On
November 10, after a contemptuous response by
Fifth Third's Kala Gibson, Fair Finance Watch
spread the fight spread to five more states.
On November 18 the Federal Reserve put 15
multi-part questions to Fifth Third, ranging
from branch closures and the Community
Reinvestment Act to potential shareholder
litigation and, at last, the Direct Express
program. Inner City Press is putting the Fed's
question letter on its DocumentCloud here,
as it will Fifth Third responses - after FOIA if
necesary, though 53 is supposed to sent them to
Fair Finance Watch.
Their
application to the Fed discloses five states
they are filing with: Michigan, Texas,
California, Florida and Arizona. On November 10
Inner City Press filed with all five.
Fair Finance Watch filed:
Fair Finance Watch has long been concerned about
Fifth Third. Fair Finance Watch has
reviewed the just-released 2024 Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act data of Fifth Third, not reviewed
in any Community Reinvestment Act performance
evaluation.
In state after state, Fifth Third for African
Americans has (many) more denials than
originations, while the opposite is true for
white borrows. The pattern is striking, starting
with two states Fifth Third and Comerica overlap
in:
In Michigan, the state Comerica abandoned for
Texas, Fifth Third in 2024 denied 249
applications from African Americans while making
fewer, only 177loans - while it made fully 4189
loans to whites and denied only 1688
applications. This is disparate [there are
more states]
***
November
17, 2025
On Fifth Third Bid for Comerica Media Reruns Spin on Huntington Amid CRA Protests 5 States
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY/SOUTH BRONX,
Nov 12 – As US bank regulators loosen rules -
including the FDIC moving to eliminate public
comment altogether on branch expansion
applications - now more big banks are moving to
get bigger.
On October 6, Fifth Third announced it will
apply to buy damaged Comerica Bank. On October
8-9, it was opposed, to the Fed and OCC. Now on
November 10, after a contemptuous response by
Fifth Third's Kala Gibson, the fight has spread
to five more states.
Meanwhile, how does today's business media work,
or not work? On November 12 a pro-business
consultancy based in Minneapolis put out a
gushing press release entitled "Fifth Third’s
Comerica Acquisition Unseats Top 10 Bank
Competitors in Small Business and Middle
Market," saying that Huntington had First
Citizens (both proposing acquisitions) have been
pushed out of the top 10. FOX 4 in Kansas City
re-ran the press release, without change,
presumably as "news," here
And so it goes - that's where Inner City Press
comes on, on this beat.
Fifth
Third's EVP of "Corporate Responsibility" Kala
Gibson wrote in urging a rubber stamp from the
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, saying that
HMDA data proves nothing. He is speaking for CEO
Tim Spence, who bragged on the day of
announcement how fast he could obtain an
approval. Well let's see.
Their
application to the Fed discloses five states
they are filing with: Michigan, Texas,
California, Florida and Arizona. On November 10
Inner City Press filed with all five.
Fair Finance Watch filed:
Fair Finance Watch has long been concerned about
Fifth Third. Fair Finance Watch has
reviewed the just-released 2024 Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act data of Fifth Third, not reviewed
in any Community Reinvestment Act performance
evaluation.
In state after state, Fifth Third for African
Americans has (many) more denials than
originations, while the opposite is true for
white borrows. The pattern is striking, starting
with two states Fifth Third and Comerica overlap
in:
In Michigan, the state Comerica abandoned for
Texas, Fifth Third in 2024 denied 249
applications from African Americans while making
fewer, only 177loans - while it made fully 4189
loans to whites and denied only 1688
applications. This is disparate [there are
more states]
***
November
10, 2025
As Fifth Third Bids to Buy Comerica Disparities Raised by Fair Finance Watch and Tricolor Loss
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY/SOUTH BRONX,
Nov 7 – As US bank regulators loosen rules -
including the FDIC moving to eliminate public
comment altogether on branch expansion
applications - now more big banks are moving to
get bigger.
On October 6, amid the pending PNC - FirstBank
and Pinnacle - Synovus proposals, Fifth Third
announced it will apply to buy damaged Comerica
Bank. Starting October 8, Fair Finance Watch
filed opposition, and Inner City Press FOIA
requests, including for the Fed's sealed
questions.
One of the damages to Comerica is
that the Treasury Department took from Comerica
its Direct Express contract - and awarded it to
Fifth Third.
Now Fifth Third has applied to the Treasury
Department's Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency to buy Comerica. Talk about picking
winners and losers.
And talking about losers, Fifth Third's
nationwide lending in 2024, the most recent year
for which data is available, was disparate:
26,121 mortgage loans to whites and only 11,566
denial to whites, versus only 1784 loans to
African Americans and even more denials:
1970. These disparities continue in Fifth
Third's other states, as Fair Finance Watch has
demonstrated. On November 7 it filed this:
In the month since Fair Finance Watch commented
to the agencies, the Federal Reserve has put
some question to Fifth Third's outside counsel
Rodgin Cohen - but has characterized them as
entirely confidential. Inner City Press
has submitted a FOIA request, and a second one
for the over-withheld
exhibits. For now, for the
record: "Fifth Third Bank faces $200M in
provisions from Tricolor ‘fraud’ - "potential
loss of millions following subprime lender
Tricolor Holdings’ bankruptcy filing.
Fifth Third faces 'nearly $200 million of
provision expense associated with the fraud at
Tricolor.'" Public hearings are
needed
Inner City Press, which has opposed the FDIC's moves to close itself to public scrutiny - American Banker op-ed here - has submitted FOIA requests on all this. The FDIC said it will eliminate public notices because it does not receive enough public comments. That is changing, starting now. Watch this site.
***
November
3, 2025
Fed Asked PNC Why Response to FFW Was Late But Accepted It on Bid for FirstBank
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE,
Oct 28 – As PNC Bank has grown it has become
more disparate in its lending. After its CEO
Bill Demchak announced a $4.1 billion proposal
to buy FirstBank and bragged, "We just
effectively bought Colorado," Fair Finance Watch
prepared an early filing to the regulators
demanding scrutiny and hearings.
This
takes place as the regulators, led by the FDIC,
are seeking to eliminate public notice and limit
public comment. See, e.g., American Banker, Sept
10, 2025, "The FDIC is taking the 'community'
out of CRA enforcement," by Matthew R. Lee, here
On
September 13 Fair Finance Watch filed challenges
with the Federal Reserve and OCC, and Inner City
Press filed Freedom of Information Act requests,
see below.
Compare
OCC denial of expedited processing here
to FRB grant of identical request here
Inner
City Press appealed.
On
October 20 the Federal Reserve belatedly asked
PNC questions, now on Patreon here
On October 28, the Fed provided Fair Finance Watch with its email to PNC asking why did it did not respond to FFW's September 18 comment within the time granted. Instead, PNC late submitted a breezy letter saying it "welcomed hearing from the two commenters who expressed concerns regarding the Proposed Transaction: Matthew Lee, Esq. of Fair Finance Watch" then citing 15 suborned letters.
On October 15 the OCC provided some responsive documents - but withheld in full 435 pages, while providing suborned letters from supportive commenters who have PNC on their Board of Directors (can you say, conflict of interest) or who name support. OCC responsive documents in Inner City Press' CloudDocument here.by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY/SOUTH BRONX,
Oct 31 – As US bank regulators loosen rules -
including the FDIC moving to eliminate public
comment altogether on branch expansion
applications - now more big banks are moving to
get bigger.
On October 6, amid the pending PNC - FirstBank
and Pinnacle - Synovus proposals, Fifth Third
announced it will apply to buy damaged Comerica
Bank. On October 8-9, it was opposed, to the Fed
and OCC.
Inner City Press submitted a Freedom of
Information Act request to the Fed, the same it
has used on other mergers, always resulting in
expedited treatment.
But
on October 16, the Fed for the first time denied
expedited treatment on Fifth Third - Comerica
and Direct Express. Inner City Press appealed,
asking that the Governors answer: what changed?
The Federal Reserve explained it was because the
application has not been filed yet. Fine. On
October 30, the Fed send "Mathew Lee,
Attached is a letter from the Federal Reserve
Bank of Cleveland (the “Reserve Bank”)
acknowledging receipt of the public comment you
submitted (the “receipt letter”) regarding Fifth
Third Bancorp’s, Cincinnati, Ohio, intended
acquisition of Comerica Incorporated, Dallas,
Texas. Also attached is a letter
from this Reserve Bank to Fifth Third's retained
counsel transmitting your comment and giving the
company an opportunity to respond."
But at 4 pm on October 31, notice of the
application was still not on the Fed's website.
Inner City Press raised just this to Governor
Michelle Bowman at the FRBKC's hearing on EGRPRA
on October 30. Watch this site.
Fair Finance Watch filed:
Dear FRB Chair Powell, Comptroller Gould:
This is an early first comment on, the proposal
and applications by Fifth Third to acquire
Comerica. Beyond the lending disparities
preliminarily identified below, the US
government's Direct Express payment program was
removed from Comerica, part of its weakening,
and given to Fifth Third, which now applies to
acquire Comerica. Public hearings are needed,
and hereby required.
Fair Finance Watch has long been concerned about
Fifth Third. Fair Finance Watch has
reviewed the just-released 2024 Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act data of Fifth Third, not reviewed
in any Community Reinvestment Act performance
evaluation.
October
27, 2025
Fed Asks Questions after PNC Bid for FirstBank Challenged on CRA by Fair Finance Watch
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE,
Oct 20 – As PNC Bank has grown it has become
more disparate in its lending. After its CEO
Bill Demchak announced a $4.1 billion proposal
to buy FirstBank and bragged, "We just
effectively bought Colorado," Fair Finance Watch
prepared an early filing to the regulators
demanding scrutiny and hearings.
This
takes place as the regulators, led by the FDIC,
are seeking to eliminate public notice and limit
public comment. See, e.g., American Banker, Sept
10, 2025, "The FDIC is taking the 'community'
out of CRA enforcement," by Matthew R. Lee, here
On
September 13 Fair Finance Watch filed challenges
with the Federal Reserve and OCC, and Inner City
Press filed Freedom of Information Act requests,
see below.
Compare
OCC denial of expedited processing here
to FRB grant of identical request here
Inner
City Press appealed.
On
October 20 the Federal Reserve belatedly asked
PNC questions, now on Patreon here
October
20, 2025
Rare
Fed denial:
"The Federal
Reserve Board
on Friday
denied an
application by
Canandaigua
National
Corporation,
of
Canandaigua,
New York. The
firm provided
a
complementary
activity
notice to the
Board
proposing to
engage in
certain
activity that
would obligate
it to acquire
real property.
Bank holding
companies are
generally
prohibited
from investing
in real
property under
the Bank
Holding
Company Act.
After
reviewing the
proposal and
considering
all the facts
and
circumstances,
the Board has
determined
that the
proposed
activity is
inconsistent
with the
factors the
Board is
required to
evaluate by
law. The
Board's order
will be
released
following a
review for
confidential
information
related to the
firm" - this
while the Fed
for the first
time denies
the Press
expedited
treatment of
FOIA about an
announced
merger (Fifth
Third /
Comerica) - Inner
City Press
immediately
appealed and
asked that it
be presented
to all
Governors,
watch this
site. Also,
asked the
Fed to take
back over HMDA
data. No
response.
October
13, 2025
As Pinnacle Bank Synovus Merger Protested Now Fed Asks About CRA and GreenSky
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
NASHVILLE, Oct
9 – Synovus Bank, with a track record of
disparate lending and consumer complaints, now
proposes to cash out and merge with
Nashville-based Pinnacle.
But Pinnacle has its own disparities, and is
under-regulated by the Tennessee Commissioner of
Financial Institutions, who refuses to provide
any documents to anyone but Tennessee "citizens"
(not even those *in* Tennessee).
So
Fair Finance Watch filed Community Reinvestment
Act challenges with the Federal Reserve and the
Georgia regulator (both have confirmed receipt
and the Fed has sent
to Pinnacle) as well as the recalcitrant
Tennessee regulator, who refuses to give records
or even confirm receipt of the challenge.
Pinnacle for now seems to think it has Tennessee
in the palm of its hand, lock stock and barrel,
regulator and media. But then there's Inner City
Press, and other states...
On
October 9 the Fed asked Pinnacle nine multi-part
questions, including "A copy of the CRA policy
to be used by the combined organization or, if
one is not available, a projected timeline for
completion. 4. Discuss the combined
organization’s plans to manage third party
partnership compliance risk exposure, including,
but not limited to, BHG Financial and GreenSky,
LLC. a. Include in your discussion anticipated
key leadership positions and any individuals
identified to fill them; plans for
reporting/Management" - full letter here.
The
Federal Reserve, while correctly granting
expedited processing to Inner City Press' FOIA
request about Pinnacle and Synovus, on October 1
wrote to say they need yet more time: "Pursuant
to section (a)(6)(B)(i) of the FOIA, we are
extending the period for our response until
October 16, 2025, in order to consult with two
or more components of the Board having a
substantial interest in the determination of the
request." Will processing of the application be
stayed?
Dear
Chair Powell and others in the FRS:
...
Fair Finance Watch has reviewed the
just-released 2024 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
data of Synovus and finds that while it made
3.18 loans to whites for each denial to whites,
it made only 1.7 loans to African Americans for
each denial to African Americans.
Pinnacle is of even greater concern. In
Virginia, where Pinnacle received a Low
Satisfactory on the Lending Test in its most
recently (May 2023) CRA performance evaluation,
in 2024 it made 133 mortgage loans to whites,
with 19 denials, but only 13 loans to African
Americans, with fully eight denials...
This application should not be approved;
particularly in light of the disparities, public
evidentiary hearings are needed.
Watch this site.
***
October
6, 2025
As Pinnacle Bank Synovus Merger Protested Now Fed Extends Time on Expedited FOIA
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
NASHVILLE, Oct
1 – Synovus Bank, with a track record of
disparate lending and consumer complaints, now
proposes to cash out and merge with
Nashville-based Pinnacle.
But Pinnacle has its own disparities, and is
under-regulated by the Tennessee Commissioner of
Financial Institutions, who refuses to provide
any documents to anyone but Tennessee "citizens"
(not even those *in* Tennessee).
So
Fair Finance Watch filed Community Reinvestment
Act challenges with the Federal Reserve and the
Georgia regulator (both have confirmed receipt
and the Fed has sent
to Pinnacle) as well as the recalcitrant
Tennessee regulator, who refuses to give records
or even confirm receipt of the challenge.
Pinnacle for now seems to think it has Tennessee
in the palm of its hand, lock stock and barrel,
regulator and media. But then there's Inner City
Press, and other states...
The
Federal Reserve, while correctly granting
expedited processing to Inner City Press' FOIA
request about Pinnacle and Synovus, on October 1
wrote to say they need yet more time: "Pursuant
to section (a)(6)(B)(i) of the FOIA, we are
extending the period for our response until
October 16, 2025, in order to consult with two
or more components of the Board having a
substantial interest in the determination of the
request." Will processing of the application be
stayed?
On
September 15 the FRB of Atlanta sent Fair
Finance Watch a list of question sent to
Pinnacle and Synovus including "an analysis of
CRA and fair lending impacts and the potential
effect on the community and customers served by
the branch, particularly distressed or
underserved nonmetropolitan middle- income
census tracts, majority-minority census tracts,
LMI census tracts, and rural areas;" and
"The Application identifies that The Vanguard
Group, Inc., BlackRock, Inc., and FMR, LLC,
would each hold more than 5 percent of the
combined organization’s common stock. Explain in
further detail why, as the Application
represents, “[n]one of these parties would
trigger any presumption of control” - full
letter on Inner City Press' DocumentCloud here
Dear
Chair Powell and others in the FRS:
...
Fair Finance Watch has long been concerned about
Synovus, as the Federal Reserve memorialized,
noting "disparities in denial rates and home
mortgage originations to African Americans
and/or Hispanics, as compared to whites, in
certain markets. The commenter also noted a
complaint filed with the CFPB against Synovus
Bank relating to collecting on a debt allegedly
not owed."
Fair Finance Watch has reviewed the
just-released 2024 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
data of Synovus and finds that while it made
3.18 loans to whites for each denial to whites,
it made only 1.7 loans to African Americans for
each denial to African Americans.
Pinnacle is of even greater concern. In
Virginia, where Pinnacle received a Low
Satisfactory on the Lending Test in its most
recently (May 2023) CRA performance evaluation,
in 2024 it made 133 mortgage loans to whites,
with 19 denials, but only 13 loans to African
Americans, with fully eight denials.
In Alabama, where Pinnacle also received a Low
Satisfactory on the Lending Test, in 2024
Pinnacle made 106 mortgage loans to whites, with
16 denials, but only 56 loans to African
Americans, with fully nine denials.
In North Carolina, where Pinnacle also received
a Low Satisfactory on the Lending Test, in 2024
Pinnacle made 653 mortgage loans to whites, with
178 denials, but only 202 loans to African
Americans, with fully 82 denials.
Even in Tennessee, which conceals its records,
Pinnacle was rated Low Satisfactory on the
Lending Test in Knoxville and Chattanooga. Not
in the exam:
In Florida in 2024 Pinnacle made 38 mortgage
loans to whites, with 11 denials, but only five
loans to African Americans, with fully NINE
denials.
In Kentucky in 2024 Pinnacle made eleven
mortgage loans to whites, with seven denials,
but NO loans to African
Americans. This application
should not be approved; particularly in light of
the disparities, public evidentiary hearings are
needed.
Watch this site.
***
September
29, 2025
First Security Bank Protest Moves to DC as FDIC Moves To Cut Notice of Branches
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SOUTH
BRONX / SDNY COURT,
Sept 24 – The Community
Reinvestment Act directs bank regulators to
consider banks' records of lending in poor
neighborhoods when they apply to expand with
mergers or, right in the statute, branches
("deposit facilities").
But
now the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is
quietly moving to eliminate public notice of,
and public comment on, banks' branch
applications. While Inner City Press has Freedom
of Information Act requests pending, Fair
Finance Watch on August 30 commented to the
FDIC, on the proposed change - and on sample
current branch applications pending.
On
August 21, in part to forestall the Federal
Reserve using the same twisted logic of "few
comments so let's eliminate public notice," Fair
Finance Watch filed a branch comment with the
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis on the pending
application by Arkansas-based First Security
Bank to open a branch at 4001 Rodney Parham Road
in Little Rock, noting that First Security Bank
in Arkansas in 2024 it made 1030 mortgage loans
to whites and denied only 120 applications, 1 to
9. For African Americans, only 17 loans and
fully 10 denials: approximately 1 to 1.7.
On September 11 First Security Bank vaguely
responded, pointing to a 2023 CRA Performance
Evaluation 1) that did not consider the 2024
HMDA data. 2) that PE states, inter alia,
Distribution on loans in non-MSA Arkansas is
"Poor" (id. at 10); on the Investment
Test in Jonesboro, Hot Springs and Fort Smith is
"Below" (id. at 13); in the same Jonesboro and
Hot Springs communities, accessibility of
delivery systems are "Below." Community
Development Services in Jonesboro, also
"Below." Fair Finance Watch
reiterated its request for hearings, and denial.
On
September 24 the Fed informed First Security
Bank that the application is being transferred
to the Board in DC and the time extended - but
only into October. Watch this site.
See
also, Inner City Press' op-ed in the American
Banker here
There
will be more.
This proposal to eliminate public notice and
comment on branch applications must be withdrawn
- or sued.
Watch
this site.
***
September
22, 2025
As Pinnacle Bank Synovus Merger Protested Now Fed Asks Fair Lending and Blackrock Qs
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
NASHVILLE, Sept
18 – Synovus Bank, with a track record of
disparate lending and consumer complaints, now
proposes to cash out and merge with
Nashville-based Pinnacle.
But Pinnacle has its own disparities, and is
under-regulated by the Tennessee Commissioner of
Financial Institutions, who refuses to provide
any documents to anyone but Tennessee "citizens"
(not even those *in* Tennessee).
So
Fair Finance Watch filed Community Reinvestment
Act challenges with the Federal Reserve and the
Georgia regulator (both have confirmed receipt
and the Fed has sent
to Pinnacle) as well as the recalcitrant
Tennessee regulator, who refuses to give records
or even confirm receipt of the challenge.
Pinnacle for now seems to think it has Tennessee
in the palm of its hand, lock stock and barrel,
regulator and media. But then there's Inner City
Press, and other states...
On
September 15 the FRB of Atlanta sent Fair
Finance Watch a list of question sent to
Pinnacle and Synovus including "an analysis of
CRA and fair lending impacts and the potential
effect on the community and customers served by
the branch, particularly distressed or
underserved nonmetropolitan middle- income
census tracts, majority-minority census tracts,
LMI census tracts, and rural areas;" and
"The Application identifies that The Vanguard
Group, Inc., BlackRock, Inc., and FMR, LLC,
would each hold more than 5 percent of the
combined organization’s common stock. Explain in
further detail why, as the Application
represents, “[n]one of these parties would
trigger any presumption of control” - full
letter on Inner City Press' DocumentCloud here
Dear
Chair Powell and others in the FRS:
...
Fair Finance Watch has long been concerned about
Synovus, as the Federal Reserve memorialized,
noting "disparities in denial rates and home
mortgage originations to African Americans
and/or Hispanics, as compared to whites, in
certain markets. The commenter also noted a
complaint filed with the CFPB against Synovus
Bank relating to collecting on a debt allegedly
not owed."
Fair Finance Watch has reviewed the
just-released 2024 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
data of Synovus and finds that while it made
3.18 loans to whites for each denial to whites,
it made only 1.7 loans to African Americans for
each denial to African Americans.
Pinnacle is of even greater concern. In
Virginia, where Pinnacle received a Low
Satisfactory on the Lending Test in its most
recently (May 2023) CRA performance evaluation,
in 2024 it made 133 mortgage loans to whites,
with 19 denials, but only 13 loans to African
Americans, with fully eight denials.
In Alabama, where Pinnacle also received a Low
Satisfactory on the Lending Test, in 2024
Pinnacle made 106 mortgage loans to whites, with
16 denials, but only 56 loans to African
Americans, with fully nine denials.
In North Carolina, where Pinnacle also received
a Low Satisfactory on the Lending Test, in 2024
Pinnacle made 653 mortgage loans to whites, with
178 denials, but only 202 loans to African
Americans, with fully 82 denials.
Even in Tennessee, which conceals its records,
Pinnacle was rated Low Satisfactory on the
Lending Test in Knoxville and Chattanooga. Not
in the exam:
In Florida in 2024 Pinnacle made 38 mortgage
loans to whites, with 11 denials, but only five
loans to African Americans, with fully NINE
denials.
In Kentucky in 2024 Pinnacle made eleven
mortgage loans to whites, with seven denials,
but NO loans to African
Americans. This application
should not be approved; particularly in light of
the disparities, public evidentiary hearings are
needed.
Watch this site.
***
September
15, 2025
First Security Bank Protested As FDIC Moves To Cut Notice of Branches Citing Few Protests
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SOUTH
BRONX / SDNY COURT,
Sept 12 – The Community
Reinvestment Act directs bank regulators to
consider banks' records of lending in poor
neighborhoods when they apply to expand with
mergers or, right in the statute, branches
("deposit facilities").
But
now the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is
quietly moving to eliminate public notice of,
and public comment on, banks' branch
applications. While Inner City Press has Freedom
of Information Act requests pending, Fair
Finance Watch on August 30 commented to the
FDIC, on the proposed change - and on sample
current branch applications pending.
On
August 21, in part to forestall the Federal
Reserve using the same twisted logic of "few
comments so let's eliminate public notice," Fair
Finance Watch filed a branch comment with the
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis on the pending
application by Arkansas-based First Security
Bank to open a branch at 4001 Rodney Parham Road
in Little Rock, noting that First Security Bank
in Arkansas in 2024 it made 1030 mortgage loans
to whites and denied only 120 applications, 1 to
9. For African Americans, only 17 loans and
fully 10 denials: approximately 1 to 1.7.
On September 11 First Security Bank vaguely
responded, pointing to a 2023 CRA Performance
Evaluation 1) that did not consider the 2024
HMDA data. 2) that PE states, inter alia,
Distribution on loans in non-MSA Arkansas is
"Poor" (id. at 10); on the Investment
Test in Jonesboro, Hot Springs and Fort Smith is
"Below" (id. at 13); in the same Jonesboro and
Hot Springs communities, accessibility of
delivery systems are "Below." Community
Development Services in Jonesboro, also
"Below." Fair Finance Watch
reiterates its request for hearings, and denial.
See also, Inner City Press' op-ed in the
American Banker here
There
will be more.
This proposal to eliminate public notice and
comment on branch applications must be withdrawn
- or sued.
Watch
this site.
***
September
8, 2025
Filed with the Fed:
Federal
Reserve Board
and Federal
Reserve Bank
of St. Louis
Re: Timely
Comment on
Branch
Application
for First
Security Bank
Dear Chair
Powell,
Secretary and
FRBSL:
On behalf of
Fair Finance
Watch and in
my personal
capacity this
is a timely
comment
opposing the
pending branch
application by
First Security
Bank to
establish a
deposit
facility at
4001 Rodney
Parham Road,
Little Rock,
Arkansas. The
application is
listed in the
FRB's H2A with
a comment
period running
through
September 1 -
Labor Day.
This August 31
comment is
timely.
FFW notes in
the FDIC's
pending
proposal RIN
3064-AG10:
"the FDIC has
received a
limited number
of public
comments in
response to
subpart C
applications....
Therefore, the
FDIC is
proposing to
eliminate the
public notice
and related
public comment
period from
subpart C and
to make
conforming
changes to
subpart A of
12 CFR part
303 of the
FDIC
Rules."
The Community
Reinvestment
Act specifies
that "the
appropriate
Federal
financial
supervisory
agency shall
(1) assess the
institution's
record of
meeting the
credit needs
of its entire
community,
including low-
and
moderate-income
neighborhoods,
consistent
with the safe
and sound
operation of
such
institution;
and (2) take
such record
into account
in its
evaluation of
an application
for a deposit
facility by
such
institution."
That is, the
only
enforcement
mechanism of
CRA is its
consideration
on
applications
for deposit
facilities:
branches.
But now the
Federal
regulator(s)
blithely
propose(s) to
eliminate
public notice
and public
comment on
branch
applications.
This is
blatantly
against the
CRA.
This proposal
to eliminate
public notice
and comment on
branch
applications
must be
withdrawn.
Ironically,
the FDIC's
reasoning is
that few
comments are
filed. So,
that is now
changing.
FFW has
reviewed the
2024 HMDA data
- not in any
CRA evaluation
- of First
Security Bank
in Arkansas in
2024 it made
1030 mortgage
loans to
whites and
denied only
120
applications,
1 to 9. For
African
Americans,
only 17 loans
and fully 10
denials:
approximately
1 to
1.7.
This is
disparate and
a hearing is
requested,
timely
opposition
made.
Again, the
only
enforcement
mechanism of
CRA is its
consideration
on
applications
for deposit
facilities:
branches.
A hearing is
requested,
timely
opposition
made
September
1, 2025
Inner City
Press live
tweeted the
Lisa Cook v.
Trump hearing
on August 29 -
and the notice
of
non-admittance
to the DDC of
the Fed's
lawyer, after.
Resolved.
We'll have
more on this
August
25, 2025
The
"new" Fed is
asking
questions - then
bank(s)
snailmail.
From a
consulting
group in
Little Rock, a
velobound spin
on CRA (while
it was
FedEZfiled to
the Fed. Then
last
week:
"Application
by BancFirst
Corporation,
Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma
(BANF),
pursuant to
Section
3(a)(3) and
3(a)(5) of the
Bank Holding
Company (BHC)
Act of 1956,
as amended, to
acquire and
merge with
AmeriBank
Holding
Company
(AmeriBank),
parent of
American Bank
of Oklahoma
(ABOK), both
of
Collinsville,
Oklahoma Dear
Mr. Shadid:
Mr. Matthew
Lee has
submitted an
adverse
comment
regarding your
filing; in
accordance
with the
Board’s ex
parte
procedures
described in a
letter to you
dated July 8,
2025, Mr. Lee
and the
agencies
copied on this
request are
entitled to
receive the
nonconfidential/public
portion of
your
response....
Non-Confidential/Public
- Additional
Items
Requested 1.
Provide all
the financial
statements
requested
below
beginning as
of June 30,
2025, and
denote what
date any
subsequent
projections
may be
referring to;
for example,
June 30, 2026
or December
31, 2026, etc.
2. Provide
interim ABOK
bank-level
current and
pro forma
applicable
capital ratios
for the period
of time in
which BANF
plans to hold
ABOK as a
separate bank
subsidiary. 3.
To the extent
possible,
provide the
following
current and
pro forma bank
level capital
and asset
quality ratios
for BancFirst
in which the
pro forma
scenario
reflects the
proposed bank
merger of ABOK
into and with
BancFirst: a.
Common Equity
Tier 1, Tier 1
Leverage, Tier
1 Risk-based
Capital, and
Total
Risk-based
Capital
ratios; and b.
Non-performing
Asset (“NPA”)
ratio in which
the NPA ratio
should be
calculated by
dividing the
sum of
nonaccrual
loans and
leases,
restructured
or modified
loans and
leases, and
other real
estate owned,
by the sum of
total equity
capital plus
the allowance
for credit
losses
(“ACL”). 4. To
the extent
possible,
provide
financial
projections,
including
capital
ratios, for
the next three
years for BANF
parent-only,
BANF
consolidated,
and BancFirst
bank-only
level
reflecting the
proposed bank
merger of ABOK
into and with
BancFirst. a.
If applicable,
include
payments
and/or other
financial
obligations
(if any) that
may be related
to the consent
orders
involving ABOK
referenced in
the prior
request for
additional
items sent on
August 1,
2025.
We'll
have more on
this.
August
18, 2025
Nevermind...
The Federal
Reserve Board
on Friday
announced that
it will sunset
its novel
activities
supervision
program and
return to
monitoring
banks' novel
activities
through the
normal
supervisory
process. Since
the Board
started its
program to
supervise
certain crypto
and fintech
activities in
banks, the
Board has
strengthened
its
understanding
of those
activities,
related risks,
and bank risk
management
practices. As
a result, the
Board is
integrating
that knowledge
and the
supervision of
those
activities
back into the
standard
supervisory
process and is
rescinding its
2023
supervisory
letter
creating the
program.
August
11, 2025
Synovus Lending Disparities and CFPB Fine Bode Badly For Pinnacle Which Says Too Early
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SOUTH
BRONX/SDNY,
Aug 4 – Synovus Bank, with a track record of
disparate lending and consumer complaints, now
proposes to cash out and merge with
Nashville-based Pinnacle.
Pinnacle has said it's too early to say much:
"Joe Bass, a spokesman for Pinnacle, noted that,
when the merger closes, the combined bank would
have $116 billion in assets, compared to $55
billion for Pinnacle today. “It’s way too
soon to answer specific questions about specific
programs." So when will it not be too early?
Fair Finance Watch, as the Federal Reserve
memorialized, has noted "disparities in denial
rates and home mortgage originations to African
Americans and/or Hispanics, as compared to
whites, in certain markets. The commenter also
noted a complaint filed with the CFPB against
Synovus Bank relating to collecting on a debt
allegedly not owed."
Since then, Synovus showed up in the criminal
"We Build the Wall" prosecution in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New
York, covered by Inner City Press, and in NSF
investigations.
Fair Finance Watch has reviewed the
just-released 2024 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
data of Synovus and finds that while it made
3.18 loans to whites for each denial to whites,
it made only 1.7 loans to African Americans for
each denial to African Americans. We will have
more on these troubling disparities, including
under the Community Reinvestment Act. Watch this
site.
***
August
4, 2025
Federal
Reserve
Governor
Adriana Kugler
announces she
will step down
from her
position on
the central
bank’s board,
effective Aug.
8, so new
nomination
coming
July
28, 2025
Synovus Lending Disparities and CFPB Fine Bode Badly For Pinnacle Proposal FFW Details
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SOUTH
BRONX/SDNY,
July 25 – Synovus Bank, with a track record of
disparate lending and consumer complaints, now
proposes to cash out and merge with
Nashville-based Pinnacle.
Fair Finance Watch, as the Federal Reserve
memorialized, has noted "disparities in denial
rates and home mortgage originations to African
Americans and/or Hispanics, as compared to
whites, in certain markets. The commenter also
noted a complaint filed with the CFPB against
Synovus Bank relating to collecting on a debt
allegedly not owed."
Since then, Synovus showed up in the criminal
"We Build the Wall" prosecution in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New
York, covered by Inner City Press, and in NSF
investigations.
Fair Finance Watch has reviewed the
just-released 2024 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
data of Synovus and finds that while it made
3.18 loans to whites for each denial to whites,
it made only 1.7 loans to African Americans for
each denial to African Americans. We will have
more on these troubling disparities, including
under the Community Reinvestment Act. Watch this
site.
***
July
21, 2025
Cadence Bank Faced Fair Lending DOJ Charge Inner City Press Told Fed Now Industry Moves
By
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
FEDERAL
COURT / BRONX, July 16 -- How out of control is
the merger rubber stamping of the U.S. Federal
Reserve and other regulators, even as they are
ostensibly working to improve?
It was reported that Cadence Bank is looking to
settle with DOJ on lending discrimination. But
Inner City Press / Fair Finance Watch protested
Cadence to the Federal Reserve in 2018 - and the
Fed approved the merger.
Inner
City Press / Fair Finance Watch wrote: "timely
first comment on, the Applications of Cadence
Bancorporation, Houston, Texas; to acquire State
Bank Financial Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia,
and thereby indirectly acquire State Bank and
Trust Company, Macon, Georgia As an initial
matter, this is a request that the FRS
immediately send by email to Inner City Press
all non-exempt portions of the applications /
notices for which the Applicants have requested
confidential treatment.
Fair
Finance Watch has been tracking Cadence Bank: In
2017 in the Dallas, Texas MSA for convention
home purchase loans, Cadence made 99 such loans
to whites - and NONE, not a single origination,
to African Americans. In 2017 in the Houston
Texas MSA for convention home purchase loans,
Cadence made 236 such loans to whites - and only
15 to African Americans, and only 23 to Latinos.
This is not in keeping with the aggregate, which
made 37,128 such loans to whites, 3151 to
African Americans and 8215 to
Latinos.
In
2017 in the Birmingham, Alabama MSA for
convention home purchase loans, Cadence made 66
such loans to whites - and only ONE to African
Americans. Even combining in Table 4-1, it was
79 home purchase loans to whites and only THREE
to African Americans. This should
also be address in this proceeding, including at
the requested evidentiary hearing: “Cadence Bank
- Racist manager 2800 Post Oak Blvd Suite
101, Houston, TX 77056, USA Oct 14, 2017 NOT
RESOLVED I had my 2 business accounts at the
Williams tower location, I tried talking to the
manager about small business loans she always
avoided me looking at me kind of weird whenever
I done withdrawals she always asked me why I'm
taking money out after 3 months she sent me a
Leter saying she's going to be closing my
account because I take money out ones a week for
payroll and she didn't like that”
This
was covered not only in Inner City Press, here
on FOIA abuses the Fed did nothing about, but
also, for example, Barron's,
here.
And the Fed rubber stamped the merger.
Jump
cut to July 2025 when the Fed let Cadence
acquire scandal-plagued Industry
Bancshares a mere two months after Cadence
announced the proposed acquisition. The Fed then
lifted its order against Industry Bancshares for
"unsafe or unsound banking practices." Beyond
rubber stamping... Watch this site.
***
July
14, 2025
"The
Board is also
proposing to
make similar
changes to its
supervisory
rating
framework for
insurers
regulated by
the Board" - what,
for fair
insurnce?
Doubtful...
July
7, 2025
Amid
all the
criminality in
the financial
sector,
this was the
Federal
Reserve's
enforcement
action last
week:
WHEREAS,
the Board of
Governors of
the Federal
Reserve System
(the “Board of
Governors”),
pursuant to
section 8(e)
of the Federal
Deposit
Insurance Act,
as amended
(the “FDI
Act”), 12
U.S.C. §
1818(e),
issues this
Order of
Prohibition
(the “Order”)
upon the
consent of
Respondent
Kendall
Hickman
(“Hickman”), a
former
employee and
institution-affiliated
party, as
defined in
sections 3(u)
and 8(b)(3) of
the FDI Act,
12 U.S.C. §§
1813(u) and
1818(b)(3), of
Jonah Bank of
Wyoming (the
“Bank”), a
state member
bank; WHEREAS,
Hickman was an
employee of
the Bank from
July 1, 2021,
until her
termination on
June 15, 2023;
WHEREAS, prior
to and during
the same
period,
Hickman served
as a
bookkeeper for
a nonprofit
organization;
WHEREAS, from
March 6, 2018,
to June 16,
2023, Hickman
embezzled a
total of
$33,212.84
from the
nonprofit
organization;
Huge.
June
30,
2025
Gov
Barr: "As far
as collecting
data, I would
also point to
our Community
Perspectives
Survey and the
Small Business
Credit Survey,
which the
Cleveland Fed
has conducted
since 2020.2
Beyond
collecting and
analyzing
data, the
Federal
Reserve's CD
function also
conducts
qualitative
research to
understand the
"why" behind
the data" -
then why is
the Fed so
dismissive of
HMDA data? Now
the
2024 is out...
June 23,
2025
on
Friday, the
Board
announced the
termination of
the
enforcement
actions listed
below:
UniCredit,
S.p.A., Milan,
Italy,
UniCredit Bank
AG, Munich,
Germany, and
UniCredit Bank
Austria AG,
Vienna,
Austria Cease
and Desist
Order dated
April 15, 2019
(PDF)
Terminated
June 5, 2025
China
Construction
Bank
Corporation,
Beijing,
People's
Republic of
China and
China
Construction
Bank New York
Branch, New
York, New
York. Yeah.
June 16,
2025
Gov
Bowman: "to
promote
accountability,
regulators
must be
transparent—both
in supervision
and
regulation.
Successful
policymaking
requires
openness and
humility,
caution and a
deliberate
approach. I
can assure the
Committee that
if I am
confirmed as
the Vice Chair
for
Supervision, I
will be
strongly
committed to
these values." We'll see,
on FOIA and
esp on
mergers....
June
9, 2025
CFPB
Double
Kneecaps HMDA
Analysis as
Summary Table
Search Spins
and Spins
SOUTH
BRONX / DC, June
6 – Before Capital One announced and applied to
buy Discover, they and their law firm were
allowed to meet secretly with the Federal
Reserve, see below.
After they applied late March 20, 2024
Inner City Press submitted a Freedom of
Information Act request to the Fed. While they
granted expedited treatment, they delayed nearly
a near before on March 4, 2025 dumping over 1000
redacted pages.
On
March 28 the Fed has announced that "the federal
bank regulatory agencies today announced, in
light of pending litigation, their intent to
issue a proposal to both rescind the Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA) final rule issued in
October 2023 and reinstate the CRA framework
that existed prior."
On
March 31 the CFPB cut back on how HMDA data is
provided; on April 2 Fair Finance Watch
petitioned the Fed "to take emergency measures
to ensure public access to simply analyzable
data under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
(HMDA), including the 2024 data. Until now - for
2023 and before - CFPB has provided a filtering
page
for HMDA data, searchable by geography and
applicant characteristics.
On
March 31 the CFPB rather than adding 2024 data
to the filtering site linked above put
up only modified LARS by institution and a
large raw data date for which it provided a
warning.
The
effect of this is to make it significantly more
difficult for community groups to analyze and
compare lenders' HMDA data.
On
June 6, even for the 2023, a summary table
search even for a small institution just spun
and spun. The FRB should put a
simple collating / analyzing web interface with
the 2024 up forthwith.
The Fed's late-provided FOIA documents begin
with ex parte meetings between the bank, its law
firm and the Fed - telephone calls in February
2024, and a meeting inside the Fed on March 7,
2024 (the Fed waited until March 4, 2025 to
disclose this). 1000 page on Inner City Press'
DocumentCloud here.
200+ more pages here.
FOIA determination letter here
Inner
City Press has filed a FOIA appeal to the
Federal Reserve - and raised it in a March 21
comments, along with a new Bank for
International Settlements study that cries out
for denial of the merger.
On
March 24, the Fed's response: "Because your
letter was received after the end of the public
comment period, it will not be made a part of
the record of this case unless the Board in its
sole discretion determines to consider your late
comments." Yeah, discretion...
***
June 2,
2025
Thou
dost protest
too much: "At
the
President's
invitation,
Chair Powell
met with the
President
today at the
White House to
discuss
economic
developments
including for
growth,
employment,
and inflation.
Chair Powell
did not
discuss his
expectations
for monetary
policy, except
to stress that
the path of
policy will
depend
entirely on
incoming
economic
information
and what that
means for the
outlook.
Finally, Chair
Powell said
that he and
his colleagues
on the FOMC
will set
monetary
policy, as
required by
law, to
support
maximum
employment and
stable prices
and will make
those
decisions
based solely
on careful,
objective, and
non-political
analysis."
May
26, 2025
And
there is is,
or was:
Reconsideration
of Board
action --
request for
reconsideration
of the Board's
approval of
(1) the
application by
Capital One
Financial
Corporation
(Capital One),
McLean,
Virginia, to
acquire
Discover
Financial
Services
(Discover),
Riverwoods,
Illinois, and
(2) Capital
One's notice
to acquire
certain of
Discover's
nonbanking
companies.
Denied: May
12, 2025
May
19, 2025
Governor
Barr spoke at
the 2025
Northeast /
Mid-Atlantic
Small Business
Credit
Symposium
- but no 1071
update...
May 12,
2025
Friday
was Fed day: "Governor
Michael Barr
speaks at the
Reykjavik
Economic
Conference at
5:55 a.m.,
followed by
Fed Governor
Adriana Kugler
at 6:45 a.m. …
Richmond Fed
President Tom
Barkin will
speak at the
Loudoun County
Chamber of
Commerce at
8:30 a.m. …
Fed Governors
Christopher
Waller and
Lisa Cook, New
York Fed
President John
Williams,
Cleveland Fed
President Beth
Hammack,
former Fed
Governor Kevin
Warsh (and Larry
Summers) speak
at a monetary
policy
conference
hosted by the
Hoover
Institution.
All this
and they can't
respond to
FOIA requests
on a timely
basis...
May 5,
2025
April
28, 2025
On
April 24,
this: "The
Federal
Reserve Board
on Thursday
announced the
withdrawal of
guidance for
banks related
to their
crypto-asset
and dollar
token
activities and
related
changes to its
expectations
for these
activities.
These actions
ensure the
Board's
expectations
remain aligned
with evolving
risks and
further
support
innovation in
the banking
system. The
Board is
rescinding its
2022
supervisory
letter
establishing
an expectation
that state
member banks
provide
advance
notification
of planned or
current
crypto-asset
activities. As
a result, the
Board will no
longer expect
banks to
provide
notification
and will
instead
monitor banks'
crypto-asset
activities
through the
normal
supervisory
process." Now
what?
April
21, 2025
In Florida Disparate United Community Banks Granted ANB By Fed Amid Lending Disparities
by
Matthew R.
Lee, Patreon Substack
FEDERAL COURT, April
16
–
In Florida, United Community Bank is trying to
move into the Miami area via merger, with a
disparate lending record. Fair Finance Watch
with Inner City Press on the FOIA has filed a
timely first comment on, the Application by UCB
to acquire American National Bank.
But consider United Community Bank's disparate
lending record:
In South Carolina in 2023, United Community
Banks made 673 mortgage loans to whites with 282
denials. Meanwhile to African Americans in the
state it made only FIFTY ONE loans, while
denying fully 45 applications.
In
Florida in 2023, United Community Banks made 240
mortgage loans to whites with 86 denials.
Meanwhile to African Americans in the state it
made only TWELVE loans, while denying five
applications.
Nationwide, United Community Banks is scarcely
better. In 2023 overall it made 5576 mortgage
loans to whites with 4114 denials. Meanwhile to
African Americans nationwide it made only 477
loans, while denying fully 1246 applications.
That is to say, while UCB to whites had more
loans then denial, to African Americans it had
nearly three times as many denials as of loans.
On
April 16 the Fed approved, calling Fair Finance
Watch the commenter and noting, "The data cited
by the commenter corresponds to publicly
available 2023 data reported by both banks under
the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975
(“HMDA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq." - this while
the Fed has refused to respond to FFW's petition
that it ensure 2024 HMDA data is available as
before. We'll have more on this.
Watch
this site.
***
April
14, 2025
Gov
Bowman, April 10:
"to promote
accountability,
regulators
must be
transparent—both
in supervision
and
regulation.
Successful
policymaking
requires
openness and
humility,
caution and a
deliberate
approach. I
can assure the
Committee that
if I am
confirmed as
the Vice Chair
for
Supervision, I
will be
strongly
committed to
these values."
We'll see:
Before
Capital One
announced and
applied to buy
Discover, they
and their law
firm were
allowed to
meet secretly
with the
Federal
Reserve.
After they applied late March 20, Inner
City Press submitted a Freedom of Information
Act request to the Fed. While they granted
expedited treatment, they delayed nearly a near
before on March 4 dumping over 1000 redacted
pages.
These begin with ex parte meetings between the
bank, its law firm and the Fed - telephone calls
in February 2024, and a meeting inside the Fed
on March 7, 2024 (the Fed waited until March 4,
2025 to disclose this). 1000 page on Inner City
Press' DocumentCloud here.
200+ more pages here.
FOIA determination letter here
Inner City Press immediately appealed. More than a month later, and apparently preparing its rubber stamp, the Federal Reserve upheld its own withholding in full and denied the appeal, letter here.
April
7, 2025
CFPB Kneecaps HMDA Analysis as Feds Drop CRA Rule as Fed Hides Talks with Capital One
SOUTH
BRONX / DC, April
2 – Before Capital One announced and applied to
buy Discover, they and their law firm were
allowed to meet secretly with the Federal
Reserve, see below.
After they applied late March 20, 2024
Inner City Press submitted a Freedom of
Information Act request to the Fed. While they
granted expedited treatment, they delayed nearly
a near before on March 4, 2025 dumping over 1000
redacted pages.
On
March 28 the Fed has announced that "the federal
bank regulatory agencies today announced, in
light of pending litigation, their intent to
issue a proposal to both rescind the Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA) final rule issued in
October 2023 and reinstate the CRA framework
that existed prior."
On
March 31 the CFPB cut back on how HMDA data is
provided; on April 2 Fair Finance Watch
petitioned the Fed "to take emergency measures
to ensure public access to simply analyzable
data under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
(HMDA), including the 2024 data. Until now - for
2023 and before - CFPB has provided a filtering
page
for HMDA data, searchable by geography and
applicant characteristics.
On
March 31 the CFPB rather than adding 2024 data
to the filtering site linked above put
up only modified LARS by institution and a
large raw data date for which it provided a
warning.
The
effect of this is to make it significantly more
difficult for community groups to analyze and
compare lenders' HMDA
data. The FRB
should put a simple collating / analyzing web
interface with the 2024 up
forthwith.
The Fed's late-provided FOIA documents begin
with ex parte meetings between the bank, its law
firm and the Fed - telephone calls in February
2024, and a meeting inside the Fed on March 7,
2024 (the Fed waited until March 4, 2025 to
disclose this). 1000 page on Inner City Press'
DocumentCloud here.
200+ more pages here.
FOIA determination letter here
Inner
City Press has filed a FOIA appeal to the
Federal Reserve - and raised it in a March 21
comments, along with a new Bank for
International Settlements study that cries out
for denial of the merger.
On
March 24, the Fed's response: "Because your
letter was received after the end of the public
comment period, it will not be made a part of
the record of this case unless the Board in its
sole discretion determines to consider your late
comments." Yeah, discretion...
***
March
31, 2025
Fed
Snubs New BIS
Study of Data
and Antitrust
Cited on
Capital One
Discover
Merger by FFW
SOUTH
BRONX, March
25 – Before Capital One announced and applied to
buy Discover, they and their law firm were
allowed to meet secretly with the Federal
Reserve.
After they applied late March 20, Inner
City Press submitted a Freedom of Information
Act request to the Fed. While they granted
expedited treatment, they delayed nearly a near
before on March 4 dumping over 1000 redacted
pages.
These begin with ex parte meetings between the
bank, its law firm and the Fed - telephone calls
in February 2024, and a meeting inside the Fed
on March 7, 2024 (the Fed waited until March 4,
2025 to disclose this). 1000 page on Inner City
Press' DocumentCloud here.
200+ more pages here.
FOIA determination letter here
Inner
City Press has filed a FOIA appeal to the
Federal Reserve - and raised it in a March 21
comments, along with a new Bank for
International Settlements study that cries out
for denial of the merger.
On
March 24, the Fed's response: "Because your
letter was received after the end of the public
comment period, it will not be made a part of
the record of this case unless the Board in its
sole discretion determines to consider your late
comments." Yeah, discretion...
***
March
24, 2025
New BIS
Study of Data
and Antitrust
Cited to Fed
Against
Capital One
Discover
Merger
SOUTH
BRONX, March
21 – Before Capital One announced and applied to
buy Discover, they and their law firm were
allowed to meet secretly with the Federal
Reserve.
After they applied late March 20, Inner
City Press submitted a Freedom of Information
Act request to the Fed. While they granted
expedited treatment, they delayed nearly a near
before on March 4 dumping over 1000 redacted
pages.
These begin with ex parte meetings between the
bank, its law firm and the Fed - telephone calls
in February 2024, and a meeting inside the Fed
on March 7, 2024 (the Fed waited until March 4,
2025 to disclose this). 1000 page on Inner City
Press' DocumentCloud here.
200+ more pages here.
FOIA determination letter here
Inner
City Press has filed a FOIA appeal to the
Federal Reserve - and raised it in a March 21
comments, along with a new Bank for
International Settlements study that cris out
for denial of the merger. Who's in the
OCC's and Fed's wallet, now?
***
March
17, 2025
Stock Fraudster Sterling Bancorp OKed To Sell Bank with Weak CRA to Everbank Shirking NY
by
Matthew R.
Lee, Patreon Substack
FEDERAL COURT, March
14
–
Sterling Bancorp, which settled with DOJ on
securities fraud, it trying to sell its Sterling
Bank & Trust including in New York, where it
has a need to improve CRA Investment Test rating
to Everbank. Fair Finance Watch with Inner City
Press on the FOIA has filed a timely first
comment on, the Applications
This is a request for a full copy of, and a
timely first comment on, the Applications of
EverBank to acquire Sterling Bank & Trust
(with a rare Needs to Improve CRA rating on
Investment Test in New York), and not scandal
plagued Sterling
Bancorp.
Sterling Bancorp was recently prosecuted by DOJ;
EverBank purports that by buying the bank
portion it is not touched by the scandal. But
what is the showing that the criminal conduct at
the Bancorp was entirely insulated from the bank
and those who work there, and its
practices? As a
CRA matter, militating for a hearing, Sterling
Bank has a rare Needs to Improve rating on the
investment test in NY.
On
December 24 Everbank wrote in to the Fed stating
that "EverBank maintains the following two
office locations in New York, neither of which
is a “branch”... Islandia, NY: Located at 11
Oval Drive, Suite 107, Islandia, NY 11749.11
This location consists of an approximately
31,000 square-foot facility... EverBank notes
that its lease for the Islandia, New York
location is due to expire in 2025, after which
EverBank expects to move the back-office
operations currently conducted at that location
to another non-branch office location on Long
Island, New York." Needs to improve...
Nevertheless
on Friday, March 14 the Fed hauled off and
approved it, noting that FFW - "the commenter
criticized the CRA record of Sterling Bank with
respect to its “Needs to Improve” rating on the
investment test (“Investment Test”) component of
the bank’s statewide ratings in Michigan, New
York, and Washington" - then saying "EverBank
intends to renovate many of Sterling Bank’s
existing branches." Yeah.
***
March
10, 2025
In
Florida
Disparate
United
Community
Banks Wants
ANB Now Fed Qs
Including on
CRA
by
Matthew R.
Lee, Patreon Substack
FEDERAL COURT, March
6
–
In Florida, United Community Bank is trying to
move into the Miami area via merger, with a
disparate lending record. Fair Finance Watch
with Inner City Press on the FOIA has filed a
timely first comment on, the Application by UCB
to acquire American National Bank.
But consider United Community Bank's disparate
lending record:
In South Carolina in 2023, United Community
Banks made 673 mortgage loans to whites with 282
denials. Meanwhile to African Americans in the
state it made only FIFTY ONE loans, while
denying fully 45 applications.
In
Florida in 2023, United Community Banks made 240
mortgage loans to whites with 86 denials.
Meanwhile to African Americans in the state it
made only TWELVE loans, while denying five
applications.
Nationwide, United Community Banks is scarcely
better. In 2023 overall it made 5576 mortgage
loans to whites with 4114 denials. Meanwhile to
African Americans nationwide it made only 477
loans, while denying fully 1246 applications.
That is to say, while UCB to whites had more
loans then denial, to African Americans it had
nearly three times as many denials as of loans.
To
this, on February 11 UCB through outside counsel
replied that while Fair Finance Watch "cites
data for the Bank’s lending in South Carolina,
Florida and 'nationwide,' the comment’s
assertion that “nationwide” data is relevant is
misplaced." What a surprise. They ignore their
disparities.
In
March the Fed asked questions, including on CRA
(and a Confidential question), and "Discuss the
purpose of each of the following provisions in
the Merger Agreement and whether any provisions
listed below would be considered to permit UCBI
or United Community Bank to exercise prior
control over the management or policies of
Bank: i. ii. Article 5.1(u),
which states that American Bank may not make or
acquire or issue a commitment for (i) any
commercial real estate Loan in an original
principal amount in excess of $7,000,000, (ii)
any residential Loan originated for retention in
the Loan portfolio in an original principal
amount in excess of $1,500,00 or (iii) any
commercial or industrial Loan in an original
principal amount in excess of $2,000,000."
Watch
this site.
***
March 3,
2025
Gov
Philip
Jefferson said in
a speech last
week,
"Policymakers'
approach to
communication
has evolved
over time. In
the past,
policymakers
were not
focused on
clarity and
transparency
in their
communications
as they are
today. For
example,
former Fed
Chair Alan
Greenspan
famously
quipped in
1987, "If I
seem unduly
clear to you,
you must have
misunderstood
what I said.""
But how
transparent is
the Fed now?
Long delays on
FOIA, for
example....
February
24, 2025
Federal Reserve Defended Terminating Master Accounts Now BSJI Cites Fed on Debanking
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Feb 17 – The Federal Reserve - both the Board of
Governors in Washington and the FRBNY - have
been sued by Banco San Juan International for
the terminal of its master account(s).
On
the motion to dismiss, oral arguments were held
on December 12 before U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New York Judge John G.
Koeltl. Inner City Press was there. Thread:
Fed's
lawyers from Simpson Thacher law firm cite
Custodia (crypto) case. Does this outside
counsel rep raise conflicts of interest on
mergers?
Note:
Simpson Thacher represents many banks applying
to the Fed for merger approvals - why did
the Fed, which has many in house lawyers,
have to hire them? And isn't there now a
conflict of interest on the merger applications?
Fed: The Reserve Banks are not govt
Plaintiff:
The Fed never closed the master accounts of
Deutsche Bank, despite wrongdoing - and what
about "Toronto Dominion, which pled guilty to
money laundering"?
[Note:
TD's Leonardo Ayala is being prosecuted in the
District of NJ]
On
January 8, 2025 Judge Koeltl dismissed the
amended complaint, setting a time to further
amend: "the defendants' motions to dismiss are
granted. All of BSJI's claims are dismissed
without prejudice as discussed above. At oral
argument, counsel for BSJI indicated that BSJI
may wish to file a second amended complaint. Tr.
16. The time to file a motion to amend,
attaching a copy of the second amended complaint
and explaining how the second amended complaint
solves the deficiencies noted in this opinion,
is January 27, 2025. The defendants may respond
by February 10, 2025. The plaintiff may reply by
February 17, 2025. If the plaintiff does not
file any such motion by January 27, 2025, the
Court will issue an order directing that
judgment be entered dismissing the Amended
Complaint."
On
February 17 BSJI through counsel Abbe Lowell
wrote in citing Fed Chair Jerome Powell's recent
testimony that he is (belatedly) troubled by
de-banking by the Reserve Banks. Full letter on
Patreon here
Inner
City Press will stay on these cases.
This case is Banco San Juan Internacional, Inc. v. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York, et al., 1:23-cv-06414 (Koeltl)
***
February
17, 2025
As CFPB
Home Page Goes
404 HMDA
Petition to
Federal
Reserve by
Fair Finance
Watch
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
Bronx / Federal
Court, Feb 11 – When a "404: Page Not
Found" message began on the homepage of the U.S.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a call
went out among consumer advocates to dig deeper
in the site and begin downloading data before it
is deleted. Fine.
But the CFPB has become the platform on which
new data under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
is released. Simply downloading past years' data
is not enough. Where will the 2024 data go, and
be available to the public?
Fair Finance Watch, with Inner City Press on the
FOIA, filed a petition for rulemaking and
emergency mitigation with the Federal Reserve
Board:
Governor
Powell, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Fair Finance Watch and Inner City Press are
writing to petition the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System under section 553(e)
of the Administrative Procedure Act to engage in
rulemaking and, most immediately, to take
emergency measures to ensure public access to
data under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
(HMDA), including the 2024 data.
When the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
was created, the hosting of HMDA data shifted
from the FFIEC to CFPB website.
Today February 10, 2025 the
CFPB.gov website went dark. While portions of
the site are as of this writing still available,
it is foreseeable that the HMDA data site may be
taken down. The
Community Reinvestment Act, among other banking
laws, is largely enforced by use and analysis of
HMDA data. It is imperative that public access
to HMDA data remain.
The
FRB should begin a process to ensure access to
HMDA data, on FFIEC or the FRB's own website -
by rulemaking, if necessary long term, but
immediate on an interim basis, if necessary
mirroring the CFPB cite as long as it remains
under threat.
This petition concerning the continued public
access to HMDA data is also made with reference
to Section 553(e) of the APA, and we
respectfully request a response.
Watch this site. Others like NCRC are advocating. We aim to have more from DC
***
February
10, 2025
Now the
Fed has
announced the
termination of
two
enforcement
actions with
Wells Fargo -
the one with
the predatory
lender Wells
Fargo
Financial...
February
3, 2025
Crime:
John Harold
Rogers, 63, a
former Senior
Adviser for
the Federal
Reserve Board
of Governors
was arrested
on charges
that he
conspired to
steal Federal
Reserve trade
secrets for
the People’s
Republic of
China
Revolving
door: Coinbase has
added to its Global
Advisory
Council former
New York Fed
President Bill
Dudley...
January
25, 2025
It was the
Federal
Reserve Bank of
Atlanta that
on January 23
asked "Provide
a complete
list of the
non-branch
offices of
EverBank,
National
Association
and Sterling
Bank. " Watch
this site.
January
20, 2025
On
Capital One
Discover OCC
Doubled Down
on FOIA
Withholding
Now Customers
Cut Off
SOUTH
BRONX, Jan
17 – Capital One has applied to buy Discover, in
an anticompetitive deal that should be rejected
by regulators if they mean what they have been
saying. After they applied late March 20,
Inner City Press submitted a second Freedom of
Information Act request to the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (and to the Federal
Reserve).
On
May 14 - still without providing FOIA documents
- the OCC and Fed set a July 19 virtual public
meeting.
On
the eve of it, Capital One announced a vague and
less than credible plan - they previously
violated their ING Direct pledge - including
this time $75 billion in largely subprime auto
loans. Fair Finance Watch testified for three
minutes.
On
June 25 the OCC belatedly responded to Inner
City Press' FOIA request - by withholding in
full 185 pages. OCC FOIA production on
DocumentCloud here.
Inner City Press appealed.
On July 24, the very day on which the OCC and
Fed said they were closing the written comment
period, the OCC upheld in full its FOIA denials,
determination letter on Inner City Press'
Document Cloud here.
Inner City Press has requested an extension of
the comment periods - the Fed hasn't even
responded.
Nor does it seem the Fed has taken note of
Capital One cutting off its own customers on
January 16, then passing the buck to a third
party vendor, Fidelity Information Services.
Something is deeply wrong with Capital One, but
the Fed and OCC don't seem to care.
Meanwhile
Capitol One lobbying continues even now in 2024,
from New
Mexico even to Harlem by a social worker
with bankers on the board. How is this
Astroturfing organized?
Without
approvals, now the banks have set shareholders'
votes for February 18, 2025.
As
documented by Fair Finance Watch, Discover Bank
in 2022 denied mortgage loans application from
African Americans more than twice as frequently
as those of whites. It grew worse in the
just-out 2023 data.
Previously, Inner City Press and NCRC challenged Capital One's acquisition of ING Direct, see here.This time, given the antitrust enforcement claims being made in DC, this proposal should be denied. But will it be? Watch this site.
***
January
13, 2025
UMB Bank Heartland Merger Hit on Disparties and Uninsured Deposits Now Rubber Stamped
by
Matthew R.
Lee, Patreon Substack
SOUTH BRONX /
SDNY, Jan 10
–
When First Republic Bank failed / was given to
JP Morgan Chase, a small list of other regional
banks came into focus as in danger. Among them
was UMB - a bank whose lending Inner City Press
and Fair Finance Watch had been scrutinizing,
and now challenge.
UMB is asking its regulators to allow it to
expand, buying Denver-based Heartland. The
application, Fair Finance Watch on June 21
formally told the Fed, should not be
approved. In 2022, the most recent
year for which Federal data is available, UMB
Bank, N.A. made over 2000 mortgage loans to
whites, and only 117 loans to African Americans.
For
every denial to an African American, it made
only 2.02 loans. But for whites, for every
denial it made 3.45 loans. It should be referred
to DOJ.
There
is litigation, there is also this, reported at
the time of Silicon Valley Bank's failure: "UMB
Bank, a regional bank headquartered in Kansas
City, Missouri, and with branches across the
Midwest, Southwest, and Western United States,
has total assets of $38 billion and deposits
totaling $32 billion, according to the FDIC.
However, only 16% of deposits fall under the
$250,000 FDIC insurance threshold, leaving
74.11% (equivalent to $28.36 billion) vulnerable
to potential losses."
Why
would regulators even consider approving its
expansion? On June 21, Fair Finance Watch filed
a formal Community Reinvestment Act challenge to
UMB's application to the Federal Reserve, adding
state by state data:
UMB Bank in 2022 in Missouri made 842 mortgage
loans to whites, and only 76 loans to African
Americans. Meanwhile it denied 41 applications
from African Americans, and only 257 from
whites.
UMB Bank in Colorado - in which it seeks to
expand - in 2022 made 378 mortgage loans to
whites, and only 13 loans to African Americans.
Meanwhile it denied six applications from
African Americans, and only 107 from whites.
UMB Bank in 2022 in Texas made 78 mortgage loans
to whites, and only six loans to African
Americans. Meanwhile it denied two applications
from African Americans, and only 27 from
whites.
These disparities cry out for a referral to DOJ,
and public hearings on, and denial of, UMB's
major expansion application.
On
October 11 UMB's outside counsel Davis Polk sent
the Fed a response but withheld branch closing,
subsidiary, fintech and crypto information from
Fair Finance Watch - so Inner City Press cc-ed
them on a FOIA request.
On
November 29, the Fed responded with the branch
closing list and more - now on Inner City Press'
DocumentCloud here.
Watch
this site.
***
January
6, 2025
If the
Federal
Reserve Banks
are not the
government,
how can they
give out
approval like
this?
"New
York NBT
Bancorp Inc.,
Norwich, New
York—waiver of
application to
acquire Evans
Bancorp, Inc.,
Williamsville,
New York, and
thereby
acquire Evans
Bank, National
Association
(Evans Bank),
Angola, New
York, in
connection
with the
merger of
Evans Bank
with and into
NBT Bank,
National
Association,
Norwich, New
York.*
Granted:
December 18,
2024."
December
30, 2024
The Fed is
supposed to
sent copies of
its question
letters to
banking to the
community
groups which
have commented
on,
particularly
against, the
proposed
merger. But on
Capital One -
Discover, the
Fed just stopped.
Capital One
disclosed the
letter, but
not the
contents, in
SEC filings. A
new low.
December
23, 2024
Fraudster Sterling Bancorp Bid To Sell Bank with Weak CRA to Everbank Questioned on NY
by
Matthew R.
Lee, Patreon Substack
FEDERAL COURT, Dec 20
–
Sterling Bancorp, which settled with DOJ on
securities fraud, it trying to sell its Sterling
Bank & Trust including in New York, where it
has a need to improve CRA Investment Test rating
to Everbank. Fair Finance Watch with Inner City
Press on the FOIA has filed a timely first
comment on, the Applications
This is a request for a full copy of, and a
timely first comment on, the Applications of
EverBank to acquire Sterling Bank & Trust
(with a rare Needs to Improve CRA rating on
Investment Test in New York), and not scandal
plagued Sterling
Bancorp.
Sterling Bancorp was recently prosecuted by DOJ;
EverBank purports that by buying the bank
portion it is not touched by the scandal. But
what is the showing that the criminal conduct at
the Bancorp was entirely insulated from the bank
and those who work there, and its
practices? As a
CRA matter, militating for a hearing, Sterling
Bank has a rare Needs to Improve rating on the
investment test in NY.
On
December 4 Everbank's outside counsel wrote in
that FFW "selectively criticizes a single
component of Sterling Bank’s most recent CRA
performance evaluation from states in which
Sterling Bank either no longer operates, will no
longer operate upon completion of the Proposed
Transaction, or maintains only a de minimis
banking presence" -- that would be New York, no
commitment to improve on the Needs to Improve.
As to Michigan the outside counsel says, or
brags, "EverBank intends to close Sterling
Bank’s only Michigan branch following completion
of the Proposed Transaction."
On
December 19, the Federal Reserve asked Everbank
questions including "Explain whether EverBank’s
office in New York is a “branch” within the
meaning of 12 U.S.C. 1841(o)(3) and indicate
whether loan proceeds are disbursed at that New
York office.
3.
The FR Y-3 notes: “following the Proposed
Transaction, the combined organization intends
to leverage the CRA and consumer protection
compliance strengths of both banks to create a
strong and comprehensive combined compliance
program.” The FR Y-3 subsequently states that
“EverBank does not anticipate any structural
changes to its CRA program, CRA leadership,
organizational structure, or oversight as a
result of the Proposed Transaction.” Clarify
whether the combined organization intends to
continue to utilize EverBank’s existing CRA and
consumer compliance programs following
consummation. If the combined organization
intends to incorporate specific aspects of
Sterling Bank’s CRA and consumer those programs
the combined organization intends to leverage
from Sterling Bank’s existing operations.
4.
The FR Y-3 notes that Sterling Bank would use
commercially reasonable efforts to close its
Southfield, Michigan branch... Indicate whether
a branch closure notice has been submitted under
section 42 of the FDI Act."
The
proposal should be denied.
***
December
16, 2024
SouthState Lending Disparities Triggered CRA Protest But Fed OKs Admitting Weak Carolinas
by
Matthew R.
Lee, Patreon Substack
SOUTH BRONX /
SDNY, Dec 13
–
When First Republic Bank failed / was given to
JP Morgan Chase, a small list of other regional
banks came into focus as in danger, banks whose
lending Inner City Press and Fair Finance Watch
had been scrutinizing, even more so that the
2023 data is out.
This week Inner City Press filed with the Fed, a
timely first comment on, the Applications of
SouthState Corporation to merge with Independent
Bank Group, Inc., and Independent
Bank.
SouthState in South Carolina in 2023 - data not
yet included in any CRA exam - made 5013
mortgage loans to whites, and only 228 loans to
African Americans. Meanwhile it denied only 670
applications from whites, and fully 195 from
African Americans. SouthState should be referred
to DOJ.
SouthState in North Carolina in 2023 - data not
yet included in any CRA exam - made 1334
mortgage loans to whites, and only FIFTY SEVEN
loans to African Americans. Meanwhile it denied
only 173 applications from whites, and fully 20
from African Americans.
SouthState in Georgia in 2023 - data not yet
included in any CRA exam - made 1176 mortgage
loans to whites, and only 318 loans to African
Americans. Meanwhile it denied only 304
applications from whites, and fully 88 from
African Americans.
Nationwide
in 2023, SouthState made 7798 mortgage loans to
whites, and only 947 loans to African Americans.
Meanwhile it denied only 2491 applications from
whites, and fully 558 from African
Americans.
Why would regulators even consider approving its
expansion?
On
August 9, SouthState submitted to the Fed a
response - that deals only with Independent
Bank.
On
September 18, the Fed asked SouthState questions
including "Confirm that no consumer products or
community development programs or services
offered by either organization will be
discontinued by the combined organization as a
result of the proposed transaction, other than
those identified in Confidential Exhibit 18 to
the application."
Inner
City Press has submitted a FOIA request with the
Fed for that obviously CRA-material Exhibits.
No thanks to the Fed, Inner City Press got the
exhibit - SouthState just withdrew its request
for confidential treatment, of this:
"CONFIDENTIAL SouthState Bank, N.A.
Independent Bank Discontinued Independent
Bank Products and Services June 2024
SSC and IBTX currently plan on discontinuing
Independent Bank’s mortgage warehouse program
and selling its Shared National Credits (SNC)
portfolio. Almost all purchased SNCs are in
Independent Bank’s commercial loan portfolio,
with the largest single industry concentration
in energy."
But
there is more being withheld. SouthState filed
on September 30: "Please see Confidential
Exhibit 1 to the Confidential Appendix for
additional information on branch actions
SouthState may plan to take that are unrelated
to the proposed transaction."
On
December 13 the Fed rubber stamped the deal,
even as it admitted it is order poor performance
in South Carolina and poor geographic
distribution of SouthState's loans in North
Carolina. This is today's Fed.
***
December
9, 2024
First Busey $1B Bid For CrossFirst Hit by Fair Finance Watch Now Fed Asks Sealed Question
by
Matthew R.
Lee, Patreon Substack
FEDERAL COURT, Dec 5
–
In the Midwest, Busey Bank is trying to move
into the Kansas City area via merger, with a
disparate lending record. Fair Finance Watch
with Inner City Press on the FOIA has filed a
timely first comment on, the Applications
Van Dukeman, First Busey's CEO called it a
"great fit from a cultural perspective." But
consider Busey Bank's culture - including
contempt for CRA, its disparate lending
record:
First
Busey's Busey Bank in Illinois in 2023 - data
not yet included in any CRA exam - made 1163
mortgage loans to whites, and only 772 loans to
African Americans. Meanwhile it denied only 216
applications from whites, and fully 24 from
African Americans. Busey Bank should be referred
to DOJ.
Busey
Bank in Missouri in 2023 - data not yet included
in any CRA exam - made 49 mortgage loans to
whites, and only seven loans to African
Americans. Meanwhile it denied only 21
applications from whites, and fully eight from
African Americans
Busey
Bank in Indiana in 2023 - data not yet included
in any CRA exam - made 22 mortgage loans to
whites, and only two loans to African
Americans.
Busey
Bank in Florida in 2023 - data not yet included
in any CRA exam - made 80 mortgage loans to
whites, and only ONE loan to an African
American.
Rather
than provide CRA info, First Busey's Monica L.
Bowe, Executive Vice President & Chief Risk
Officer of First Busey Corporation - and of the
Risk Management Association- submitted a letter
saying CRA conditions are never attached -
false, and telling.
Now
after questions Busey's outside counsel has
disclosed that Busey "has been the target of
multiple law firms’ efforts to solicit customers
via the internet to bring a mass arbitration
based on overdraft and NSF fees, specifically
Authorize Positive, Settle Negative and
Representment fees, both of which Busey Bank
stopped charging in 2022. Busey Bank first
became aware of these solicitations in February,
2024. Representatives of Busey have spoken with
representatives of some of these law firms and
have received demands for attorneys’ fees and
potential refunding of certain fees and Busey
management is currently discussing the path
forward with counsel."
On
December the Federal Reserve cc-ed Inner City
Press on its question to Busey Bank - but the
question was entirely withheld.
That's today Fed.
The
merger should be denied. Watch this site.
***
December
2, 2024
UMB Bank Application for Heartland Hit on Disparties Info Withheld Now Won Under FOIA
by
Matthew R.
Lee, Patreon Substack
SOUTH BRONX /
SDNY, Nov 29
–
When First Republic Bank failed / was given to
JP Morgan Chase, a small list of other regional
banks came into focus as in danger. Among them
was UMB - a bank whose lending Inner City Press
and Fair Finance Watch had been scrutinizing,
and now challenge.
UMB is asking its regulators to allow it to
expand, buying Denver-based Heartland. The
application, Fair Finance Watch on June 21
formally told the Fed, should not be
approved. In 2022, the most recent
year for which Federal data is available, UMB
Bank, N.A. made over 2000 mortgage loans to
whites, and only 117 loans to African Americans.
For
every denial to an African American, it made
only 2.02 loans. But for whites, for every
denial it made 3.45 loans. It should be referred
to DOJ.
There
is litigation, there is also this, reported at
the time of Silicon Valley Bank's failure: "UMB
Bank, a regional bank headquartered in Kansas
City, Missouri, and with branches across the
Midwest, Southwest, and Western United States,
has total assets of $38 billion and deposits
totaling $32 billion, according to the FDIC.
However, only 16% of deposits fall under the
$250,000 FDIC insurance threshold, leaving
74.11% (equivalent to $28.36 billion) vulnerable
to potential losses."
Why
would regulators even consider approving its
expansion? On June 21, Fair Finance Watch filed
a formal Community Reinvestment Act challenge to
UMB's application to the Federal Reserve, adding
state by state data:
UMB Bank in 2022 in Missouri made 842 mortgage
loans to whites, and only 76 loans to African
Americans. Meanwhile it denied 41 applications
from African Americans, and only 257 from
whites.
UMB Bank in Colorado - in which it seeks to
expand - in 2022 made 378 mortgage loans to
whites, and only 13 loans to African Americans.
Meanwhile it denied six applications from
African Americans, and only 107 from whites.
UMB Bank in 2022 in Texas made 78 mortgage loans
to whites, and only six loans to African
Americans. Meanwhile it denied two applications
from African Americans, and only 27 from
whites.
These disparities cry out for a referral to DOJ,
and public hearings on, and denial of, UMB's
major expansion application.
On
October 11 UMB's outside counsel Davis Polk sent
the Fed a response but withheld branch closing,
subsidiary, fintech and crypto information from
Fair Finance Watch - so Inner City Press cc-ed
them on a FOIA request.
On
November 29, the Fed responded with the branch
closing list and more - now on Inner City Press'
DocumentCloud here.
Watch
this site.
***
November
25, 2024
First Busey $1B Bid For CrossFirst Hit by Fair Finance Watch Now They Disclose Legal Threat
by
Matthew R.
Lee, Patreon Substack
FEDERAL COURT, Nov 20
–
In the Midwest, Busey Bank is trying to move
into the Kansas City area via merger, with a
disparate lending record. Fair Finance Watch
with Inner City Press on the FOIA has filed a
timely first comment on, the Applications
Van Dukeman, First Busey's CEO called it a
"great fit from a cultural perspective." But
consider Busey Bank's culture - including
contempt for CRA, its disparate lending
record:
First
Busey's Busey Bank in Illinois in 2023 - data
not yet included in any CRA exam - made 1163
mortgage loans to whites, and only 772 loans to
African Americans. Meanwhile it denied only 216
applications from whites, and fully 24 from
African Americans. Busey Bank should be referred
to DOJ.
Busey
Bank in Missouri in 2023 - data not yet included
in any CRA exam - made 49 mortgage loans to
whites, and onlyseven loans to African
Americans. Meanwhile it denied only 21
applications from whites, and fully eight from
African Americans
Busey
Bank in Indiana in 2023 - data not yet included
in any CRA exam - made 22 mortgage loans to
whites, and only two loans to African
Americans.
Busey
Bank in Florida in 2023 - data not yet included
in any CRA exam - made 80 mortgage loans to
whites, and only ONE loan to an African
American.
Rather
than provide CRA info, First Busey's Monica L.
Bowe, Executive Vice President & Chief Risk
Officer of First Busey Corporation - and of the
Risk Management Association- submitted a letter
saying CRA conditions are never attached -
false, and telling.
Now
after questions Busey's outside counsel has
disclosed that Busey "has been the target of
multiple law firms’ efforts to solicit customers
via the internet to bring a mass arbitration
based on overdraft and NSF fees, specifically
Authorize Positive, Settle Negative and
Representment fees, both of which Busey Bank
stopped charging in 2022. Busey Bank first
became aware of these solicitations in February,
2024. Representatives of Busey have spoken with
representatives of some of these law firms and
have received demands for attorneys’ fees and
potential refunding of certain fees and Busey
management is currently discussing the path
forward with counsel."
November
18, 2024
UMB Bank Application for Heartland Hit on Disparties Info Withheld Now FOIA Delay
by
Matthew R.
Lee, Patreon Substack
SOUTH BRONX /
SDNY, Nov 12
–
When First Republic Bank failed / was given to
JP Morgan Chase, a small list of other regional
banks came into focus as in danger. Among them
was UMB - a bank whose lending Inner City Press
and Fair Finance Watch had been scrutinizing,
and now challenge.
UMB is asking its regulators to allow it to
expand, buying Denver-based Heartland. The
application, Fair Finance Watch on June 21
formally told the Fed, should not be
approved. In 2022, the most recent
year for which Federal data is available, UMB
Bank, N.A. made over 2000 mortgage loans to
whites, and only 117 loans to African Americans.
For
every denial to an African American, it made
only 2.02 loans. But for whites, for every
denial it made 3.45 loans.
On
June 21, Fair Finance Watch filed a formal
Community Reinvestment Act challenge to UMB's
application to the Federal Reserve, adding state
by state data:
UMB Bank in 2022 in Missouri made 842 mortgage
loans to whites, and only 76 loans to African
Americans. Meanwhile it denied 41 applications
from African Americans, and only 257 from
whites.
UMB Bank in Colorado - in which it seeks to
expand - in 2022 made 378 mortgage loans to
whites, and only 13 loans to African Americans.
Meanwhile it denied six applications from
African Americans, and only 107 from whites.
UMB Bank in 2022 in Texas made 78 mortgage loans
to whites, and only six loans to African
Americans. Meanwhile it denied two applications
from African Americans, and only 27 from
whites.
These disparities cry out for a referral to DOJ,
and public hearings on, and denial of, UMB's
major expansion application.
On
October 11 UMB's outside counsel Davis Polk sent
the Fed a response but withheld branch closing,
subsidiary, fintech and crypto information from
Fair Finance Watch - so Inner City Press cc-ed
them on a FOIA request for:
This
is a formal FOIA request for the withheld
exhibits to UMB's October 11 submission to the
Federal Reserve in connection with its protested
application to acquire Heartland Financial, in
particular "Confidential" Exhibits A and B,
including about fintech and branch closings and
all activities engaged in by corporate
subsidiaries. This is presumptively public; if
any is withheld, all reasonably segregable
portions should be provided.
UMB
recites and responds: 1. Provide a description
of the activities conducted by the following UMB
subsidiaries: a. UMBCDC, Inc., Kansas City,
Missouri; b. UMB Financial Services, Inc.,
Kansas City, Missouri; c. UMB Management Equity
Holdings Inc., Kansas City, Missouri; d. UMB
Merchant LLC, Kansas City, Missouri; and e. UMB
Asset Management, LLC, Kansas City, Missouri The
requested information is included in AIR
Confidential Exhibit A. Convenience and Needs 2.
Provide an update on UMB Bank’s branch
consolidation analysis and confirm whether any
of the branches listed in Public Exhibit 3 of
the Additional Information Response, dated
August 5, 2024 (“August AI Response”) would be
consolidated, following consummation of the
proposed transaction. The requested information
is included in AIR Confidential Exhibit B.
Discuss any plans to engage in
crypto-asset-related activities or fintech
partnerships. The requested information is
included in AIR Confidential Exhibit
A.
Again,
this is both important for the public to know
and is presumptively public; if any is withheld,
all reasonably segregable portions should be
provided.
On
November 12 - a month after the request - the
Fed wrote that it was unilaterally extending its
time to respond to November 26.
Watch
this site.
***
Your support means a lot. As
little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access
to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here
to become a patron.
November
11, 2024
First Busey $1B Bid For CrossFirst Hit by Fair Finance Watch Info Hidden Now FOIA Delay
by
Matthew R.
Lee, Patreon Substack
FEDERAL COURT, Nov 4 –
In the Midwest, Busey Bank is trying to move
into the Kansas City area via merger, with a
disparate lending record. Fair Finance Watch
with Inner City Press on the FOIA has filed a
timely first comment on, the Applications
Van Dukeman, First Busey's CEO called it a
"great fit from a cultural perspective." But
consider Busey Bank's culture - including
contempt for CRA, its disparate lending
record:
First
Busey's Busey Bank in Illinois in 2023 - data
not yet included in any CRA exam - made 1163
mortgage loans to whites, and only 772 loans to
African Americans. Meanwhile it denied only 216
applications from whites, and fully 24 from
African Americans. Busey Bank should be referred
to DOJ.
Busey
Bank in Missouri in 2023 - data not yet included
in any CRA exam - made 49 mortgage loans to
whites, and onlyseven loans to African
Americans. Meanwhile it denied only 21
applications from whites, and fully eight from
African Americans
Busey
Bank in Indiana in 2023 - data not yet included
in any CRA exam - made 22 mortgage loans to
whites, and only two loans to African
Americans.
Busey
Bank in Florida in 2023 - data not yet included
in any CRA exam - made 80 mortgage loans to
whites, and only ONE loan to an African
American.
There
is litigation, for example under the FCRA, here
- dropped without explanation, presumable
settled, the FRB should ask First Busey about
all outstanding consumer litigation.
And
there was the First Busey board member,
Elisabeth Kimmel, caught in the college
admissions scandal, here.
When
the Fed provided the application, the banks had
withheld their CRA data. So, "This is a formal
FOIA request for the withheld exhibits to the
First Busey / CrossFirst application, in
particular "Confidential" Exhibits 9 ("First
Busey Community Reinvestment Act Data") and 10
("CrossFirst Community Reinvestment Act data").
This is presumptively public."
Rather
than provide the CRA info, First Busey's Monica
L. Bowe, Executive Vice President & Chief
Risk Officer of First Busey Corporation - and of
the Risk Management Association- submitted a
letter saying CRA conditions are never attached
- false, and telling.
Inner
City Press' FOIA request? The Fed on November 4
extended its time to reply - and unlike other
less arrogant banks, First Busey has provided
nothing. Watch this site.
***
November
4, 2024
Today's
FRB gives out
gifts to
redliners in
secret. Consider:
St. Louis
German
American
Bancorp, Inc.,
Jasper,
Indiana—waiver
of application
to acquire
Heartland
BancCorp,
Whitehall,
Ohio, and
simultaneously
merge
Heartland
Bank,
Whitehall,
Ohio, with and
into German
American Bank,
Jasper,
Indiana.
Granted:
October 22,
2024
From
September,
ongoing: Fair
Finance Watch
has been
concerned for
some time with
German
American
Bank's
outreach /
image and
lending. In
Indiana in
2023 - in HMDA
data not yet
taken into
account in any
CRA exam -
German
American Bank
based on its
marketing made
1743 mortgage
loans to
whites, and
only SIXTEEN
loans to
African
Americans.
Meanwhile it
denied 11
applications
from African
Americans, and
only 356 from
whites
October
28, 2024
From
the FRB of Chicago:
"Dear Matthew:
This is in
reference to
the filing by
First Busey
Corporation,
Champaign,
Illinois, to
merge with
CrossFirst
Bankshares,
Inc., Leawood,
Kansas
(“Applicant”),
and thereby
indirectly
acquire
CrossFirst
Bank, Leawood,
Kansas. This
will
acknowledge
receipt of
your comment
email dated
October 15,
2024. Your
comment has
been accepted
by the Federal
Reserve Bank
of Chicago
(“Reserve
Bank”)
relative to
this filing
and will be
made a part of
the record. A
copy of your
comment has
been forwarded
to Applicant
for an
opportunity to
respond and if
Applicant
responds, you
will be
provided a
copy of the
response. To
the extent the
comment letter
and request
for a hearing
dated October
15, 2024, also
seeks records
under the
Freedom of
Information
Act (“FOIA”),
it does not
comply with
section
261.11(a)(2)
of the Board’s
Rules relating
to the
submission of
FOIA requests
because you
have combined
a request for
records with
comments on an
application
and a hearing
request, 12
CFR
261.11(a)(2).
This
correspondence,
therefore,
will not be
processed as a
FOIA request.
Accordingly,
if you seek
information
under the
FOIA, you may
submit a
separate
request to the
Board’s
Freedom of
Information
Office that
complies with
the
requirements
of section
261.11 of the
Board’s
Rules."
But on FOIA
requests, even
when the Board
grants expedited
processing, no
records are
received on a
timely
basis...
October
21, 2024
Expedited? From
the Fed: This is
in response to
your
electronic
message dated
and received
by the Board
on October 11,
2024. Pursuant
to the Freedom
of Information
Act (“FOIA”),
5 U.S.C. §
552, you
request:
the withheld
exhibits to
UMB’s October
11 submission
to the Federal
Reserve in
connection
with its
protested
application to
acquire
Heartland
Financial, in
particular
“Confidential”
Exhibits A and
B, including
about fintech
and branch
closings and
all activities
engaged in by
corporate
subsidiaries.
You have
requested
expedited
processing
... I
have
determined to
grant your
request for
expedited
processing
because (1)
you are
primarily
engaged in
disseminating
information,
and (2) the
application
you seek is
pending with
the Board.
Accordingly,
your request
will be
processed as
soon as
practicable
and ahead of
other FOIA
requests.
We'll see.
October
14, 2024
On First Busey,
Inner City
Press has been
granted
expedited
processing: "I
have
determined to
grant your
request for
expedited
processing
because (1)
you are
primarily
engaged in
disseminating
information,
and (2) the
application
you seek is
open for"
comment...
October
7, 2024
First Busey $1B Bid For CrossFirst Hit by Fair Finance Watch As CRA Exhibits Withheld
by
Matthew R.
Lee, Patreon Substack
FEDERAL COURT, Oct
4 –
In the Midwest, Busey Bank is trying to move
into the Kansas City area via merger, with a
disparate lending record. Fair Finance Watch
with Inner City Press on the FOIA has filed a
timely first comment on, the Applications
Van Dukeman, First Busey's CEO called it a
"great fit from a cultural perspective." But
consider Busey Bank's culture, its disparate
lending record:
First
Busey's Busey Bank in Illinois in 2023 - data
not yet included in any CRA exam - made 1163
mortgage loans to whites, and only 772 loans to
African Americans. Meanwhile it denied only 216
applications from whites, and fully 24 from
African Americans. Busey Bank should be referred
to DOJ.
Busey
Bank in Missouri in 2023 - data not yet included
in any CRA exam - made 49 mortgage loans to
whites, and onlyseven loans to African
Americans. Meanwhile it denied only 21
applications from whites, and fully eight from
African Americans
Busey
Bank in Indiana in 2023 - data not yet included
in any CRA exam - made 22 mortgage loans to
whites, and only two loans to African
Americans.
Busey
Bank in Florida in 2023 - data not yet included
in any CRA exam - made 80 mortgage loans to
whites, and only ONE loan to an African
American.
There
is litigation, for example under the FCRA, here
- dropped without explanation, presumable
settled, the FRB should ask First Busey about
all outstanding consumer litigation.
And
there was the First Busey board member,
Elisabeth Kimmel, caught in the college
admissions scandal, here.
When
the Fed provided the application, the banks had
withheld their CRA data. So, "This is a formal
FOIA request for the withheld exhibits to the
First Busey / CrossFirst application, in
particular "Confidential" Exhibits 9 ("First
Busey Community Reinvestment Act Data") and 10
("CrossFirst Community Reinvestment Act data").
This is presumptively public." Watch this site.
***
September
30, 2024
The Fed
has granted
expedited
processing,
they say, to
Inner City
Press'
SouthState
FOIA - but
still no
documents...
September
23, 2024
SouthState Lending Disparities Triggered CRA Challenge Now after FOIA Withheld Exhibit 18
by
Matthew R.
Lee, Patreon Substack
SOUTH BRONX /
SDNY, Sept
19 –
When First Republic Bank failed / was given to
JP Morgan Chase, a small list of other regional
banks came into focus as in danger, banks whose
lending Inner City Press and Fair Finance Watch
had been scrutinizing, even more so that the
2023 data is out.
This week Inner City Press filed with the Fed, a
timely first comment on, the Applications of
SouthState Corporation to merge with Independent
Bank Group, Inc., and Independent
Bank.
SouthState in South Carolina in 2023 - data not
yet included in any CRA exam - made 5013
mortgage loans to whites, and only 228 loans to
African Americans. Meanwhile it denied only 670
applications from whites, and fully 195 from
African Americans. SouthState should be referred
to DOJ.
SouthState in North Carolina in 2023 - data not
yet included in any CRA exam - made 1334
mortgage loans to whites, and only FIFTY SEVEN
loans to African Americans. Meanwhile it denied
only 173 applications from whites, and fully 20
from African Americans.
SouthState in Georgia in 2023 - data not yet
included in any CRA exam - made 1176 mortgage
loans to whites, and only 318 loans to African
Americans. Meanwhile it denied only 304
applications from whites, and fully 88 from
African Americans.
Nationwide
in 2023, SouthState made 7798 mortgage loans to
whites, and only 947 loans to African Americans.
Meanwhile it denied only 2491 applications from
whites, and fully 558 from African
Americans.
Why would regulators even consider approving its
expansion?
On
August 9, SouthState submitted to the Fed a
response - that deals only with Independent
Bank.
On
September 18, the Fed asked SouthState questions
including "Confirm that no consumer products or
community development programs or services
offered by either organization will be
discontinued by the combined organization as a
result of the proposed transaction, other than
those identified in Confidential Exhibit 18 to
the application."
Inner
City Press has submitted a FOIA request with the
Fed for that obviously CRA-material Exhibits.
No thanks to the Fed, Inner City Press got the
exhibit - SouthState just withdrew its request
for confidential treatment, of this:
"CONFIDENTIAL SouthState Bank, N.A.
Independent Bank Discontinued Independent
Bank Products and Services June 2024
SSC and IBTX currently plan on discontinuing
Independent Bank’s mortgage warehouse program
and selling its Shared National Credits (SNC)
portfolio. Almost all purchased SNCs are in
Independent Bank’s commercial loan portfolio,
with the largest single industry concentration
in energy."
Inner City Press is requesting an extension of the public comment period, public / virtual evidentiary hearings and that, on the current record, the applications not be approved
***
September
16, 2024
The Fed
is a paper
tiger? Not
only still
nothing on the
Porticoes
application -
on September
11 the Fed
issued an
enforcement
action against
Fieldpoint,
which
immediately
put out "“We
have a strong
partnership
with our
regulators,”
said H.
Russell
Holland,
President and
CEO of
Fieldpoint
Private. "Private
Holdings,
Inc., is the
holding
company of
Fieldpoint
Private Bank
& Trust, a
boutique
private
banking firm
headquartered
in Greenwich,
Connecticut,
with offices
in New York
City, Atlanta
and
Orlando/Winter
Park.
Fieldpoint
Private was
established at
the onset of
the Great
Financial
Crisis by 31
individuals,
including
former
Chairmen and
CEOs of some
of the most
well-known and
successful
financial and
consumer firms
in America."
September
9, 2024
More from the
FRB Chicago,
but from FRBNY,
*still*
nothing on the
Porticoes
application...
September
2, 2024
The Fed
*still* hasn't
sent the
request Porticoes /
"blank
check" bank
application.
But from
the FRB Chicago,
this:
"Pursuant to
your email
request,
attached is
the public
portion of the
below
filing:
ChoiceOne
Financial
Services,
Inc., Sparta,
Michigan to
merge with
Fentura
Financial,
Inc., and
thereby
indirectly
acquire The
State Bank,
both of
Fenton,
Michigan
Please confirm
receipt of
this email
after
verifying that
the document
could be
opened." We
confirmed; OOO
August
26, 2024
And
SouthState's
response -
much of it
confined to a
"Confidential"
exhibit:
Provide the
IBTX
Disclosure
Schedule
referenced in
the Merger
Agreement. A
copy of the
IBTX
Disclosure
Schedule is
attached as
Confidential
Exhibit 1. 3.
Describe in
greater detail
the purpose
and activities
of the various
trusts held by
SouthState and
IBTX that are
described in
the
application.
Both
SouthState and
IBTX have
formed or
acquired
statutory
business
trusts (the
“Trusts”) for
the purpose of
issuing trust
preferred
securities to
investors.
These entities
do not
otherwise
conduct any
business
activities.
Each of the
Trusts has
issued capital
and common
securities and
invested the
proceeds
thereof in an
equivalent
amount of
junior
subordinated
debentures
(the
“Debentures”)
issued by
either
SouthState or
IBTX. The
interest rate
payable on and
the payment
terms of the
Debentures are
the same as
the
distribution
rate and
payment terms
of the
respective
issues of
capital and
common
securities
issued by the
Trusts. The
Debentures are
subordinated
and junior in
right of
payment to all
present and
future senior
indebtedness.
SouthState and
IBTX have
fully and
unconditionally
guaranteed the
obligations of
their
respective
Trusts with
respect to the
capital and
common
securities.
Except under
certain
circumstances,
the common
securities
issued to
SouthState or
IBTX by their
respective
Trusts possess
sole voting
rights with
respect to
matters
involving
those
entities.
Under certain
circumstances,
SouthState and
IBTX may, from
time to time,
defer the
debentures'
interest
payments,
which would
result in a
deferral of
distribution
payments on
the related
trust
preferred
securities.
The Debentures
are callable
after five
years from the
date of
issuance,
therefore all
Debentures
formed or
acquired by
SouthState and
IBTX are
callable as of
June 30, 2024.
SouthState and
IBTX have
$118.6 million
and $57.3
million of
Debentures,
respectively,
outstanding as
of June 30,
2024. It is
SouthState’s
intent to
assume all
Trusts
outstanding at
IBTX and treat
the Debentures
as Tier 2
capital for
regulatory
capital
purposes. 4.
Indicate
whether
SouthState or
any of its
subsidiaries
are subject to
any state
community
reinvestment
laws. If
applicable,
explain how
the proposed
transaction
complies with
such law(s).
SouthState
confirms that
neither
SouthState nor
any of its
subsidiaries
are subject to
any state
community
reinvestment
laws. 5.
Confidential
Appendix. For
our responses
to the
information
requested in
the
Confidential
Appendix of
the AIR,
please see the
Confidential
Annex, which
also contains
Confidential
Exhibits 1 and
2.
August 19,
2024
The Fed
has asked
SouthState,
"4. Indicate
whether
SouthState or
any of its
subsidiaries
are subject to
any state
community
reinvestment
laws. If
applicable,
explain how
the proposed
transaction
complies with
such law(s)."
That's it?
August
12, 2024
Back on
June 26 on a
smaller merger,
Inner City
Press requested
records - and
was granted
expedited
treatment,
explicitly
with reference
to the July 25
expiration
of the public
comment period.
But no
records were given - and
on July 26, this: "Pursuant
to section
(a)(6)(B)(i)
of the FOIA,
we are
extending the
period for our
response until
August 9,
2024, in order
to consult
with two or
more
components of
the Board
having a
substantial
interest in
the
determination
of the
request." And
no response to
the timely
request to
exetnd the
comment
period...
But
even on August 9
by 10 pm, no
documents,
nothing.
Meanwhile the
underlying
bank urges
delegated
rubber stamp.
This is
today's Fed.
August
5, 2024
On
July 26, after a FOIA appeal - and after closing
the public comment period - the OCC belatedly
gave Inner City Press documents showing Capital
One briefed the OCC on a "big" deal in November
2023; it was code named "Project Sirius."
Then
overly chummy texts from Andy Navarrete, who
testified at the public meeting, and Pient Tran
to the OCC's Marci Heppner and others.
For
example, Andy to Marci, sorry for the late ping,
if Richard wanted to call, could you do a 1:1
Zoom at 7:30 [pm]. But of course. That and more
now on Inner City Press' DocumentCloud here
July
29, 2024
The Fed's FOIA scam is no limited to Capital One / Discovery. On June 26 on a smaller merger, Inner City Press requested records - and was granted expedited treatment, explicitly with reference to the July 25 expiration of the public comment period. But no records were given - and on July 26, this: "Pursuant to section (a)(6)(B)(i) of the FOIA, we are extending the period for our response until August 9, 2024, in order to consult with two or more components of the Board having a substantial interest in the determination of the request." And no response to the timely request to exetnd the comment period...
July 22,
2024
From
Testimony
Opposing
Capital One's
Bid to Acquire
Discover
July
18,
2024
The day the
banks
announced the
proposed
merger, Inner
City Press
submitted
Freedom of
Information
Act requests
to both the
Federal
Reserve and
the Office of
the
Comptroller of
the
Currency.
The Fed, as
has become a
pattern,
granted Inner
City Press'
FOIA request
expedited
treatment -
and then did
not provide
any of the
responsive
documents,
claiming it
needed more
time.
July
15, 2024
On Capital One Discover 3 Minutes Each OCC Withholds 185 Pages Inner City Press Appeals - Still Nothing from the Fed
SOUTH
BRONX, July
9 – Capital One has applied to buy Discover, in
an anticompetitive deal that should be rejected
by regulators if they mean what they have been
saying. After they applied late March 20,
Inner City Press submitted a second Freedom of
Information Act request to the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (and to the Federal
Reserve).
On
May 14 - still without providing FOIA documents
- the OCC and Fed set a July 19 virtual public
meeting.
On
June 25 the OCC belatedly responded to Inner
City Press' FOIA request - by withholding in
full 185 pages. OCC FOIA production on
DocumentCloud here.
Inner City Press appealed.
At
the July 19 public meeting, "each speaker will
be allotted three minutes to speak at the
meeting," the OCC and Fed on July 9 said.
July 8,
2024
Now belatedly
the Federal
Reserve has
fined
Silvergate $43
million -
previously,
Inner City
Press submitted to the Federal Reserve a Freedom
of Information Act request including: "This is a
FOIA request for all record regarding the FRS'
approval for the application / request for
membership in the Federal Reserve System by
Farmington State Bank (giving rise to FRBSF
president Daly's approval on a delegated basis
in 2021), and the subsequent renaming of the
bank to Mooonstone and taking of a stake by
FTX/Alameda. Also, for Silvergate with its
FTX connections, record reflecting any review by
the FRS of Silvergate's (and Provident Bancorp
Inc., Metropolitan Commercial Bank, Signature
Bank, Customers Bancorp Inc.) of the banks'
connections with crypto-currency firms... This
is a request for expedited treatment, in light
of the indictment of FTX / Alameda's Sam
Bankman-Fried and Caroline Ellison
(cooperating), and an upcoming January 3, 2023
hearing."
The Federal
Reserve has so far acknowledged receipt: "Your
request has been assigned number
FOIA-2023-00178. Please reference this number in
all future correspondence.
Request description: This is a FOIA
request for all record regarding the FRS'
approval for the application / request for
membership in the Federal Reserve System by
Farmington State Bank [also] any review by the
FRS of Silvergate's (and Provident Bancorp Inc.,
Metropolitan Commercial Bank, Signature Bank,
Customers Bancorp Inc.) of the banks'
connections with crypto-currency firms."
There is also a
lawsuit in Federal court in California asserting
that
"Silvergate,
a publicly traded and federally regulated bank
catering to cryptocurrency customers, maintained
both FTX and Alameda accounts. It directly aided
and abetted FTX’s fraud and breaches of
fiduciary duty via first-hand participation in
the commingling of funds, improper transfers,
and lending out of customer money. Silvergate
processed billions in transfers from FTX’s
client account at Silvergate to the Alameda
accounts. Silvergate also accepted deposits from
FTX investors—intended to be stored, traded, or
cashed out—that at Bankman-Fried’s direction
were wired straight to Alameda bank accounts and
misused."
July 1,
2024
Governor Bowman on
June 27, thou dost
protest too
much: The
processing
timelines we
see also seem
inconsistent
with a process
that is
operating
truly as a
rubber stamp.
To be clear, I
think we have
room to do
better when it
comes to
timely
regulatory
action, while
maintaining a
rigorous
review of
applications.
But extended
review periods
are not
uncommon,
particularly
when you
include
preliminary
discussions
and
pre-filings
with
regulators in
the published
processing
timelines.
June
24, 2024
Bowman
in Salzburg:
"Regulators
must also
understand, to
the extent
possible, the
consequences
of specific
innovations.
Take, for
example, the
increasing
interest in
tokenization.
There is a
risk that
tokenized
products and
platforms
could
duplicate
existing bank
deposits and
payment rails,
potentially
creating
parallel
systems. How
would these
parallel
systems
interact with,
or even
replace,
current
systems? Will
the products
and platforms
that duplicate
these deposit
and payment
functions
provide the
same legal
protections
for customers
and the
overall
financial
system that
they currently
receive?"
Crypto....
June
17, 2024
While
we *still*
wait for
documents
under FOIA request
purported to
approve
for expedited
treatment,
this: "Dear
Matthew,
We appreciate
your interest
in watching
and testifying
at the public
meeting
regarding the
proposal by
Capital One
Financial
Corporation,
McLean,
Virginia, to
acquire
Discover
Financial
Services,
Riverwoods,
Illinois,
pursuant to
the Bank
Holding
Company Act;
and to merge
Discover Bank,
Greenwood,
Delaware, into
Capital One,
National
Association,
McLean,
Virginia,
pursuant to
the Bank
Merger Act.
The public
meeting will
start at 9:00
a.m. ET on
Friday, July
19, 2024, and
will be hosted
virtually on
an online
meeting
platform. The
Federal
Reserve Board
and the Office
of the
Comptroller of
the Currency
have received
your request
to testify and
are reviewing
your request."
Reviewing?
June
10, 2024
This
month Inner
City Press has
received two
letters from
the FRB-Dallas,
one responding
to CRA protest
filed in
March, and
only now transferred
from FRB-KC to Dallas
(but not the
Board?) and
the other to
the Board. Why the
delay?
June 3,
2024
Conflict
of interest?
Revolving
door? "Numisma
Bank in
Greenwich,
Conn., has
received
conditional
approval for a
Federal
Reserve master
account.
Numisma, which
focuses on
banknote
distribution,
is a tier 3
institution
that is
state-chartered
but isn’t
backed by the
Federal
Deposit
Insurance
Corp.
The Fed has
rejected
applications
by other
financial
institutions,
including
Custodia Bank
and The Narrow
Bank, on the
grounds that
granting
access would
present an
“undue risk.”
NOTE: Numisma
was co-founded
by former Fed
Vice Chair for
Supervision
Randal Quarles...
May
27, 2024
Fed sez:
SVB lost $40
billion in
deposits in a
single day,
with
management
expecting $100
billion more
in outflows
the next day.
Together,
these outflows
represented
about 85
percent of the
bank's
deposits. In
contrast, both
the failure of
Wachovia and
Washington
Mutual in 2008
involved less
severe
outflows that
evolved over
more than a
week (the
failure of
Wachovia in
2008 included
about $10
billion in
outflows over
8 days while
the failure of
Washington
Mutual in 2008
included
outflows of
$19 billion
over 16 days).
Return to text
4. Signature
Bank received
in one day
more than
1,600
withdrawal
requests
totaling
approximately
$18.6 billion,
representing
20 percent of
its deposits.
Return to text
5. First
Republic lost
around 20
percent of its
deposits in a
single day
May
20, 2024
Capital One Should Discover Merger Dead July 19 Public Meeting Inner City Press FOIAed Fed
SOUTH
BRONX, May
14 – Capital One has applied to buy Discover, in
an anticompetitive deal that should be rejected
by regulators if they mean what they have been
saying. While they applied late March 20, as of
1 pm on March 22 there was no notice of the
Federal Reserve's or OCC's websites. Inner City
Press submitted second FOIA requests to each
agency. Public hearings should be held, not only
on antitrust but also lending disparities at
both companies.
On
April 24 the Fed extended its comment period to
May 31 - without (yet?) granting public
hearings, nor providing the FOIA documents.
On
May 14 - still without providing FOIA documents
- the Fed and OCC set a July 19 virtual public
meeting: "The public meeting will be held
virtually on July 19, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. EDT.
Members of the public seeking to present oral
comments must register by 12:00 p.m. EDT on June
28, 2024, through the online registration
webpage, which will be posted on the Board's
Capital One-Discover Application Reading Room by
May 28, 2024."
On April 19 the Fed wrote to extended its time to respond to Inner City Press' February 19 FOIA to May 3
The OCC first put its application in its reading
room. And it is an outrage, Capital One gaming
the CRA system. For example "the Proposed
Transaction would result in CONA establishing a
new assessment area in Delaware, which
will include all census tracts in Sussex County
and seven contiguous census tracts in Kent
County."
That
for a nationwide card and subprime auto
lender...
As
documented by Fair Finance Watch, Discover Bank
in 2022 denied mortgage loans application from
African Americans more than twice as frequently
as those of whites.
Previously, Inner City Press and NCRC challenged Capital One's acquisition of ING Direct, see here.This time, given the antitrust enforcement claims being made in DC, this proposal should be dead in the water. Watch this site.
***
May 13,
2024
Fed Disappeared CRA Linkbancorp Condition on Approval Now NJ Branches out of CRA
By
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell
Book
SOUTH
BRONX, May 10 – The Federal Reserve Board in
considering the proposed merger on the rebound
between New York-based Link Bank and Partners
Bancorp omitted at the eleventh hour - or
apparently the thirteenth hour - language about
a Community Reinvestment Act condition imposed
by the FDIC.
Now the Fed and its Governors have been asked
Why - and when.
Inner
City Press and Fair Finance Watch have long
exposed redlining - and in this vein, on May 6
they filed a Community Reinvestment Act
challenge with the FDIC and Federal Reserve.
In October, the FDIC required from LINKBANK a
plan to improve its lending to African
Americans, which Inner City Press has published
on its DocumentCloud
here.
But
Link kept spinning, issuing a press release
about these partial approvals without mentioning
the condition, and concluding it "remains
subject to the approval of the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System and
other customary closing conditions. LINK
anticipates closing the Merger in the fourth
quarter of 2023." We asked, How do they know?
Well,
they know that the Fed has boiler plate ready,
ready to say it is concerned with HMDA
disparities without acting on them, ready to say
they conferred with the FDIC without
acknowledging the condition the FDIC required.
The
"Corrected" Fed approval emailed to Inner City
Press on November 16 did not acknowledge the CRA
condition. But the approval order first posted -
and voted on?- did. We on November 16 filed:
Dear
Chair Powell, Secretary Misback and others in
the FRS: This is a formal request
for reconsideration under 12 CFR Part 262.3(k)
of the Board's "corrected" -- dropping the
reference to FDIC's CRA Condition - Approval of
the above-captioned applications by LINKBANCORP,
Inc..
The Board's website currently says, of this
order, that "Note: The initial version of this
order was incorrect and inadvertently posted. A
corrected version was posted on November 15,
2023."
Meanwhile,
Deputy Associate Secretary Fennell's letter to
me dated November 16 states that "today the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
has approved the proposal." If the approval was
"today" / November 16, how was it corrected on
November 15? The copy emailed to us on November
16 is entitled "Corrected."
It's worse, much worse. The original (real?
approved?) version of the order stated
"The FDIC’s approval of the merger of Bank with
the Bank of Delmarva and Virginia Partners Bank
includes a condition requiring the resultant
institution to develop an action plan, including
a marketing plan and additional outreach, to be
submitted to the FDIC for approval, for
monitoring and improving the extent of home
mortgage applications from, and originations to,
African American applicants in the resultant
institution’s assessment areas. This condition
will help ensure that the resultant institution
continues to help in meeting the credit needs of
the African American population in the resultant
institution’s assessment areas."
It is true that the FDIC imposed a CRA
condition, after receiving comments from Fair
Finance Watch / Inner City Press. The FDIC sent
the order with condition to us and we posted it
online.
So why - and when - did the Federal Reserve,
which claims to have conferred with the FDIC as
primary supervisor, abruptly take out of its
already-posted approval order the language about
the CRA condition? Was it after the Board's
approval? Who decided that the CRA condition
language should be removed? Why? To make it
unenforceable?
The
"corrected" approval order, with the CRA
language removed, is said to be: "Voting
for this action: Chair Powell, Vice Chair
Jefferson, Vice Chair for Supervision Barr,
Governors Bowman, Waller, Cook, and Kugler."
When did each vote? Were they made aware of, and
is each Governor responsible for, the removal of
the CRA condition language?
These are clearly facts that we could not
present during the official comment period, or
even prior to approval (or at least,
"correction"). And they
militate for reconsideration, for airing to each
Governor and an explanation, given the
Governors' claims and statements about their
commitment to CRA.
On
November 21 past 5 pm, a Federal Reserve staff
attorney left Inner City Press a voicemail
reading a script that the Fed General Counsel -
without showing even this to the Board members -
determined there was nothing new in the request.
But Inner City Press didn't know about the
removal of the condition language until after
the Fed said it approved it - it could NOT have
been shown before. UNreal. And the new(ish)
Governnors? What do they think or do?
May 6,
2024
Bowman
watch, May 3
she said "the
inflow of new
immigrants to
some
geographic
areas could
result in
upward
pressure on
rents, as
additional
housing supply
may take time
to
materialize."
April
29, 2024
Capital One Should Discover Merger Dead FRB Extends to May 31 Inner City Press FOIAed Fed
SOUTH
BRONX, April
24 – Capital One has applied to buy Discover, in
an anticompetitive deal that should be rejected
by regulators if they mean what they have been
saying. While they applied late March 20, as of
1 pm on March 22 there was no notice of the
Federal Reserve's or OCC's websites. Inner City
Press submitted second FOIA requests to each
agency. Public hearings should be held, not only
on antitrust but also lending disparities at
both companies.
On
April 24 the Fed extended its comment period to
May 31 - without (yet?) granting public
hearings, nor providing the FOIA documents.
On April 19
the Fed wrote to extended its
time to respond to Inner City
Press' February 19 FOIA to May
3
April
22, 2024
Capital One Should Discover Merger Dead Inner City Press FOIAed Fed Now Delay to May 3
SOUTH
BRONX, April
19 – ...On April 19,
with the Fed's comment period coming to a close,
the Fed wrote to extended its time to respond to
Inner City Press' February 19 FOIA to May 3 -
AFTER the close of the comment period.
As
documented by Fair Finance Watch, Discover Bank
in 2022 denied mortgage loans application from
African Americans more than twice as frequently
as those of whites.
Previously, Inner City Press and NCRC challenged
Capital One's acquisition of ING Direct, see here.This
time, given the antitrust enforcement claims
being made in DC, this proposal should be dead
in the water. Watch this site.
April
15, 2024
Fair
lending be damned? On
April 11,
2024, the Fed
hauled off and
approved,
noting Inner
City Press /
Fair Finance
Watch
"objected to
the proposal,
alleging that
in 2021,
Provident Bank
and Lakeland
Bank made no
home loans to
African
American
individuals in
New York
State.30
30 The
data cited by
the commenter
corresponds to
publicly
available 2021
data by
Provident Bank
and Lakeland
Bank under
HMDA.
Following
consummation
of the
proposed
transaction,
the combined
organization
will add to
its assessment
area Bronx and
Kings
counties, each
of which
includes a
significant
number of
majority-minority
and LMI
communities...
The Board also
has considered
the DOJ
Consent Order,
including
Lakeland
Bank’s efforts
towards
meeting its
obligations
under the DOJ
Consent Order,
and that the
DOJ Consent
Order binds
Provident
without
further action
by the Board."
We'll see.
April
8, 2024
Capital One Should Discover Merger Dead As Inner City Press FOIAs Fed Barr Talks Basel 3
SOUTH
BRONX, April
3 – Capital One has applied to buy Discover, in
an anticompetitive deal that should be rejected
by regulators if they mean what they have been
saying. While they applied late March 20, as of
1 pm on March 22 there was no notice of the
Federal Reserve's or OCC's websites. Inner City
Press submitted second FOIA requests to each
agency. Public hearings should be held, not only
on antitrust but also lending disparities at
both companies.
While the OCC has yet to provide some records
requested under FOIA, it put its application in
its reading room. And it is an outrage, Capital
One gaming the CRA system. For example "the
Proposed Transaction would result in CONA
establishing a new assessment area in
Delaware, which will include all census tracts
in Sussex County and seven contiguous
census tracts in Kent County."
That
for a nationwide card and subprime auto
lender...
Still no records from the Fed, so this:
This
is a FOIA request for the entirety of Capital
One's applications for regulatory approval of
its Discover proposal, including all portions
for which Capital One has requested confidential
treatment, and all communications by your agency
with the banks since February 19. As of March 22
at 1 am, the Fed's most recent H2A is from March
15
As
documented by Fair Finance Watch, Discover Bank
in 2022 denied mortgage loans application from
African Americans more than twice as frequently
as those of whites.
Previously, Inner City Press and NCRC challenged
Capital One's acquisition of ING Direct, see here.This
time, given the antitrust enforcement claims
being made in DC, this proposal should be dead
in the water.
On
April 3 speaking at NCRC's Just Economy
conference Barr said the Fed will not follow the
OCC and FDIC with merger processing reform
proposals; then he walked Basel III endgame but
not explanation why the Fed can't or won't give
Capital One documents requested on Feb 19, as to
which they purported to grant expedited
processing. Watch this site.
April
1, 2024
On the
Capital One /
Discover
merger
application,
the Fed has
granted Inner
City Press
expedited
FOIA
processing -
but as of
March 29 had
not provided a
single document....
March 25,
2024
Backsliding?
The Fed and
the other
agencies
"extended the
applicability
date of the
facility-based
assessment
areas and
public file
provisions
from April 1,
2024, to
January 1,
2026.
Therefore,
banks will not
have to make
changes to
their
assessment
areas or their
public files
as a result of
the 2023 CRA
final rule
until January
1, 2026."
Meanwhile
the Fed had not
provided
a single
record, as of
March 23, in response
to Inner City
Press' February
19 FOIA request
about Capital
One / Discover...
March
18, 2024
"The
Federal
Reserve Board
on Thursday
issued an
enforcement
action against
JPMorgan Chase
& Co. and
fined the firm
approximately
$98.2 million
for an
inadequate
program to
monitor firm
and client
trading
activities for
market
misconduct.
The Board's
action
requires
JPMorgan Chase
to review and
take
corrective
action to
address the
firm's
inadequate
monitoring
practices,
which occurred
between 2014
and 2023" - but
how many of
JPM Chase's
acquisition
has the Fed
rubber stamped
during the
time period?
March
11, 2024
Governon
Bowman in New
Jersey on March 7
bemoaned
that "policy
reforms may
make bank
M&A
transactions
more difficult
for regulators
to approve and
slow the
application
processing
timeline."
March
4, 2024
The
Federal Reserve is
getting worse
and worse on
FOIA,
including on
banks sued by
DOJ for
discrimination.
They wrote to
Inner City
Press, you
requested "the
two exhibits
withheld in
full by
Provident
Financial
Services,
Inc., Jersey
City, New
Jersey in its
January 18,
2024
Additional
Information
response in
connection its
pending
application
to
acquire
Lakeland
Bancorp, Inc.,
Oak Ridge, New
Jersey,
and
thereby
indirectly
acquire
Lakeland Bank
…. Staff
searched Board
records and
located the
documents that
are responsive
to your
request. I
have
determined,
however, that
the withheld
portions of
the January
18,
2024,
Additional
Information
submission
that are
responsive to
your request
contain
confidential
commercial and
financial
information
(e.g.,
nonpublic
business plans
and
strategies
concerning
compliance and
lending). This
information is
subject
to
withholding
and will be
withheld from
you pursuant
to Exemption 4
of the FOIA,
5 U.S.C.
§ 552(b)(4). I
have also
determined
that the
information
should be
withheld
because it is
reasonably
foreseeable
that
disclosure
would harm an
interest
protected
by an
exemption
described in
subsection (b)
of the FOIA, 5
U.S.C. §
552(b). The
responsive
documents have
been reviewed
under the
requirements
of subsection
(b), but
no
reasonably
segregable
nonexempt
information
was found.
Accordingly,
approximately
18 pages of
information
will be
withheld from
you in full."
In full...
February
26, 2024
The Fed
just keeps extending
its time on
FOIA, and not
only on Capital
One / Discover: On
February 20:
"This is in
response to
your
electronic
message dated
January 19,
2024, and
received by
the Board’s
Information
Disclosure
Section on
January 22.
Pursuant to
the Freedom of
Information
Act (“FOIA”),
5 U.S.C. §
552, you
request: the
two exhibits
withheld in
full by
Provident
Financial
Services,
Inc., Jersey
City, New
Jersey in its
January 18,
2024
Additional
Information
response in
connection its
pending
application to
acquire
Lakeland
Bancorp, Inc.,
Oak Ridge, New
Jersey, and
thereby
indirectly
acquire
Lakeland Bank,
which recently
settled
lending
discrimination
charges with
DOJ[.]
Pursuant to
section
(a)(6)(B)(i)
of the FOIA,
we are
extending the
period for our
response until
March 5, 2024,
in order to
consult with
two or more
components of
the Board
having a
substantial
interest in
the
determination
of the
request. If a
determination
can be made
before March
5, 2024, we
will respond
to you
promptly." Yeah.
February
19, 2024
Here's
a question:
What may have
been the role
of a Federal Reserve
Governor in
the lawsuit
against the
CRA regulation?
February
12, 2024
Before FNB Settled on Fair Lending Its Yadkin Merger Was Challenged But Fed Approved It
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SOUTH
BRONX,
NY Feb 5 – When First National Bank of
Pennsylvania applied to the Federal Reserve to
buy Yadkin bank in North Carolina, Fair Finance
Watch challenged it on Community Reinvestment
Act and fair lending grounds.
The
Federal Reserve, as usually, rubber stamped the
merger. Now in February 2024 the
Justice Department had sued and settled with FNB
on fair lending grounds.
Inner
City Press had wanted to ask DOJ about the Fed
(including in its recent Patriot Bank action),
but has been unable so far. Watch this
site
February
5, 2024
On January
19 Inner City
Press
submitted a
FOIA request;
on January 31
the Federal
Reserve wrote
back: Pursuant
to the Freedom
of Information
Act (“FOIA”),
5 U.S.C. §
552, you
request: the
two exhibits
withheld in
full by
Provident
Financial
Services,
Inc., Jersey
City, New
Jersey in its
January 18,
2024
Additional
Information
response in
connection its
pending
application to
acquire
Lakeland
Bancorp, Inc.,
Oak Ridge, New
Jersey, and
thereby
indirectly
acquire
Lakeland Bank,
which recently
settled
lending
discrimination
charges with
DOJ[.] You
also seek
expedited
processing for
your request.
In support of
your request
for expedited
treatment, you
state that
“[t]his
information
was submitted,
unilaterally
withheld in
full, late in
the
application
process –
there is a
need to
release it for
public
knowledge
BEFORE the
Board acts on
the
application.”
I have
determined to
grant your
request for
expedited
processing.
Accordingly,
your request
will be
processed as
soon as
practicable
and ahead of
other FOIA
requests." But
still no
documents...
January
29, 2024
What is
happening to
the Federal
Reserve?
Beyond
misrating
Patriot Bank
just before
its DOJ
redlining
settlement,
how the Fed is
withholding
info about its
inquiry into
Lakeland
Bank's
discrimination
deal. Ten days
ago - with no
documents yet
- Inner City
Press / Fair
Finance Watch
FOIA-ed the
Fed: "This is
a formal FOIA
request for
the two
exhibits
withheld in
full by
Provident
Financial
Services,
Inc., Jersey
City, New
Jersey in its
January 18,
2024
Additional
Information
response in
connection its
pending
application
to acquire
Lakeland
Bancorp, Inc.,
Oak Ridge, New
Jersey, and
thereby
indirectly
acquire
Lakeland Bank,
which recently
settled
lending
discrimination
charges with
DOJ
The January 18
response
recites then
states:
Provide an
update to all
action items
included in
the Consent
Order,
reflecting
those items
which have
been completed
and any other
pertinent
updates,
including, but
not limited
to, the status
of any
deliverables
required under
the Consent
Order that
have not yet
been
completed.
Please refer
to the
attached
Confidential
Exhibit 1 for
a response to
this
Item.
The entire
response is
withheld,
about fair
lending
compliance,
including
public
commitments
that are
unfulfilled.
This cannot
stand; the
information
must be
provided
before the
Board acts in
any way on the
application
(other than
denial.)
January
22, 2024
Lakeland
Bank DOJ Deal
Left
Disparities So
Protest &
Fed Asks of
DOJ Settlement
Withheld
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack
SOUTH
BRONX, NY, Jan 19 – When the US
Department of Justice sued and
immediately settled with
Lakeland Bank for fair lending
violations, it announced a
proposed merger with Provident
Bank.
As
if to sweep it under the carpet.
And
when Fair Finance Watch looked into it, it found
that the DOJ settlement did not address in any
way the banks' disparities in New York. So on
December 1, the FDIC's comment deadline, it
filed a protest, with Inner City Press on the
FOIA.
Jump
cut to March 15, 2023, when Provident's Deputy
General Counsel filed a letter with the New York
Fed, cc-ing Rodgin Cohen - only on New Jersey,
nothing on the disparities in New York.
On
January 18 Provident asked two Board questions -
by withholding the entire answers. Inner City
Press immediately FOIAed: " The January 18
response recites then states: Provide an update
to all action items included in the Consent
Order, reflecting those items which have been
completed and any other pertinent updates,
including, but not limited to, the status of any
deliverables required under the Consent Order
that have not yet been completed. Please refer
to the attached Confidential Exhibit 1 for a
response to this Item. The entire
response is withheld, about fair lending
compliance, including public commitments that
are unfulfilled. This cannot stand; the
information must be provided before the Board
acts in any way on the application (other than
denial.) Inner City Press / Fair Finance
Watch is a timely protestant to the application;
this is also again request that the FRB begin
putting all applications online, since the Fed
has a new electronic system for applicants. What
is the rationale for not doing this, and
allowing for delay for the public and community
organizations? In these contexts, this comment
period should be extended."
January
15, 2024
This is
what the Fed
is focused on:
The Federal
Reserve Board
on Thursday
announced the
execution of
the
enforcement
actions listed
below:
Consent
prohibition
order against
John Freeze
Former
employee of
Bank of
Jackson Hole,
Jackson,
Wyoming
Misappropriation
of documents,
including
confidential
supervisory
information
Consent cease
and desist
order and
civil money
penalty
against Randy
Johnson Former
employee of
Farmers and
Merchants
Savings Bank,
Manchester,
Iowa
Misappropriation
of
confidential
bank records
January
8, 2024
Corporate Fed,
Dallas
edition:
Thomas J.
Falk, retired
chairman and
chief
executive
officer,
Kimberly-Clark
Corporation,
Dallas, Texas,
renamed Chair.
January
1, 2024
The
Federal Reserve is on Threads,
UNlike
even
the United
Nations....
December
25, 2023
Why not
the Fed? U.S.
Bank will pay
$36 million
over
allegations
the company
illegally
blocked
out-of-work
consumers from
accessing
unemployment
benefits
during the
coronavirus
pandemic, top
federal
banking
regulators
announced on
Tuesday.
At the onset
of the
COVID-19
pandemic, U.S.
Bank had
contracts with
at least 19
states and the
District of
Columbia to
deliver
unemployment
benefits to
millions of
newly
out-of-work
Americans
through its
prepaid
card.
But due to
expanded
antifraud
controls, the
nation's
fifth-largest
lender froze
tens of
thousands of
prepaid card
accounts
without
leaving users
a way to
regain access,
according to
the U.S.
Office of the
Comptroller of
the Currency
and U.S.
Consumer
Financial
Protection
Bureau.
December
18, 2023
From
Basel III endgame to
climate, the
Fed has its
finger in the
wind. But on
protests from
low income
areas of
banks'
redlining? Not so much.
December
11, 2023
The Fed
didn't even
ask Atlantic
Union about this
issues, which
Inner City
Press raised
in September:
Re:
Second
Comments
Opposing the
Applications
by Atlantic
Union to
acquire
American
National
Bankshares
- after
Atlantic Union
is fined by
CFPB for exact
issue raised
in first
comment
Dear
Chair Powell,
Secretary
Misback and
others in the
FRS:
This is
a second
comment
opposing
Applications
of Atlantic
Union
Bankshares
Corporation,
Richmond,
Virginia to
acquire
American
National
Bankshares
Inc.,
and
American
National Bank
& Trust
Company.
Given the
CFPB's
December 7
fine and
statement
against
Atlantic
Union, on a
precise issues
raised in our
first comment
(and dismissed
in AU's law
firm's
response, and
not asked
about by the
FED in its AI
letter), this
comment must
be considered
timely.
See,
"CFPB Finds
Atlantic Union
Bank Misled
Customers
About
Fees The
Consumer
Financial
Protection
Bureau (CFPB)
has ordered
Atlantic Union
Bank to pay
$6.2 million,
saying the
bank misled
customers and
improperly
enrolled them
into paying
overdraft
fees.
The $6.2
million in
payments
includes
refunding at
least $5
million to
consumers and
paying a $1.2
million
penalty to the
CFPB’s victim
relief fund,
the regulator
said in a
Thursday (Dec.
7) press
release.
The CFPB found
that Atlantic
Union Bank
violated
federal law
when enrolling
thousands of
customers in
checking
account
overdraft
programs by
phone,
according to
the release.
Specifically,
the bank
charged fees
without proper
consent and
misled
customers
about the
terms and
costs of
overdraft
coverage, the
release
said.
“Atlantic
Union Bank
harvested
millions of
dollars in
overdraft fees
through a host
of illegal
practices,”
CFPB Director
Rohit Chopra
said in the
release.
“Americans are
fed up with
junk fee scams
and the CFPB
will continue
its work to
ensure
families are
treated
fairly.”
https://www.pymnts.com/news/cfpb/2023/cfpb-finds-atlantic-union-bank-misled-customers-about-fees/
The
comment period
should be
extended;
evidentiary
hearings
should be
held; and on
the current
record, the
application
should not be
approved
December
4, 2023
On
December 1 Fed
Government
Michael Barr
said, "Foreign
banks that
have branches
in the United
States have
access to the
discount
window.
Outside the
United States,
some of these
firms also
have access to
dollar
liquidity from
their own
central banks" --
which as Argentina
moves to
disband its
central
bank....
November
27, 2023
Fed Dropped CRA Condition on Linkbankcorp Approval after Posting now Governors Not Told
By
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell
Book
SOUTH
BRONX, Nov 21 – The Federal Reserve Board in
considering the proposed merger on the rebound
between New York-based Link Bank and Partners
Bancorp omitted at the eleventh hour - or
apparently the thirteenth hour - language about
a Community Reinvestment Act condition imposed
by the FDIC.
Now the Fed and its Governors have been asked
Why - and when. But the Fed General Counsel
dismissed the request for reconsideration
without the Governors even seeing it.
Inner
City Press and Fair Finance Watch have long
exposed redlining - and in this vein, on May 6
they filed a Community Reinvestment Act
challenge with the FDIC and Federal Reserve.
In October, the FDIC required from LINKBANK a
plan to improve its lending to African
Americans, which Inner City Press has published
on its DocumentCloud
here.
A
"Corrected" Fed approval emailed to Inner City
Press on November 16 did not acknowledge the CRA
condition. But the approval order first posted -
and voted on?- did. We on November 16 filed a
request for reconsideration, on this site.
On
November 21 past 5 pm, a Federal Reserve staff
attorney left Inner City Press a voicemail
reading a script that the Fed General Counsel -
without showing even this to the Board members -
determined there was nothing new in the request.
But Inner City Press didn't know about the
removal of the condition language until after
the Fed said it approved it - it could NOT have
been shown before. UNreal. And the new(ish)
Governors? What do they think or do?